| Subject: | Re: equivalent bi-directional mic? |
|---|---|
| From: | Dan Dugan <> |
| Date: | Tue, 31 May 2005 17:39:36 -0700 |
Rich Peet wrote: >I agree that there is a shortage of 8 mics. >back to back cardiods are the easy answer as that is an equiv. >The ME-64 is a long tube so would not be the best choice. There's also the Ambient Emesser kit, but they don't quote a noise spec. >What is the card equiv for the WL183 by Shure? WL185. 5.5dB higher noise rating, though. Mount two capsules back-to-back anti-phase? Maybe use one mic preamp for the pair? But how to deal with the PIP polarity... -Dan Dugan ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Intro and question, oryoki2000 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Fw: Storm at Brown Canyon, Dan Dugan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: equivalent bi-directional mic?, Rich Peet |
| Next by Thread: | Re: equivalent bi-directional mic?, Mark Griswold |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU