| Subject: | Re: Dat vs Edirol?? |
|---|---|
| From: | "digidandy" <> |
| Date: | Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:49:45 -0000 |
> I see that someone has sent me an attachment called > "pink_noise_analisis_DAT_vs_Edirol".xls. > The author is "IO" or perhaps "IQ". > Anyone?? Isn't the conclusion more interesting than the origin? ;-) ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Nature recording 101, Rich Peet |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Nature recording 101, J Young |
| Previous by Thread: | Dat vs Edirol??, Klas Strandberg |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: Dat vs Edirol??, Klas Strandberg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU