> > > I have used pro tools only a short while and for
>>> some reason as I try
>>> to edit
>>> every time I hit the space bar at the point I have
>>> made a cut, the
>>> curser returns
>>> all the way to the beginning and starts playing from
>>> there, instead
>>> of the point I
>>> have made the cut... It was working fine this
>>> morning... anyone know
>>> what I
>>> have done to make it do this? The same thing
>>> happened once before and
>>> I
>>> can't honestly say what I did to correct it.
>> > Greg Rademacher
>
>It's a preference, you can have it either way. Setups: Preferences:
>Operations: "Timeline insertion follows playback".
>
>1) (unchecked) When you hit the space bar the cursor goes back to the
>place you last clicked.
>
>2) (checked) the cursor stays where the playback stopped.
>
>-Dan Dugan
This could explain the mysteriousness of how it got switched: if you
have the single-key shortcut mode turned on (officially called Key
Command Focus) the "N" key toggles the Timeline insertion follows
playback preference. There is no visual feedback in the interface as
to the current setting, and it's very easy to bump the "N" key when
you go in and out of play using Space.
It's been a ProTools gripe for years... and looks like it'll never go away=
.
-jeremiah moore
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
jeremiah lyman moore | san francisco | sound+media |
http://babyjane.com/timeweb/
http://northstation.net/ organic, mechanized, organized sound
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
"Microphones are not ears,
Loudspeakers are not birds,
A listening room is not nature."
Klas Strandberg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naturerecordists/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>From Tue Mar 8 18:28:15 2005
Message: 12=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:12:24 -0500
From: Rob Danielson <>
Subject: Re: hat mic
Hi Rich--
As omni's, their sound is pretty similar with a
close-mic'd, robust source. Aside from greater
noise, the SASS lacks low end and it has some
lower mid peaks (its off the ground I assume).
Spectral analysis would reveal differences
between the hatmic and the ME-62 I'm sure, but
they don't seem huge. There's more sibilance with
the ME-62.
Sennheiser ME62 self noise 17 dB(A) sensitivity 20 mV/Pa
Panasonic WM61a (single) self noise 32
dB(A) sensitivity 17.783 mV/Pa
Crown SASS-P Stereo self noise 21 dB(A) sensitivity 6 mV/Pa
Did the SASS require greater mic preamp gain?
At $12, for close-mic'd sources, the hatmic
clearly wins. I wonder how the three mics would
compare under low level ambience and full or
close to full mic pre gaiin? But don't stay up.
Rob D.
=3D =3D =3D =3D =3D
At 12:27 AM +0000 7/14/04, Rich Peet wrote:
>Test results.
>
>As the hat mic was the only unbalanced mic I should mention that I
>did have to unplug other audio devices in the room to kill all hum.=A0
>I also had to build a battery box to get the hat mic into my quadmic
>preamp so signal did go through an additional 1uf tantilum cap.
>
>All three mics were recording at the same time using the same a/d
>converter and same preamp. Recorded in 24 bit. All three mics were
>within 3 inches of each other all pointed at the same direction. The
>traffic noise is at 90 degrees to the front.
>
>1. Sennheiser ME-62
>2. Hat mic, only one channel recorded
>3. SASS-P, only one channel recorded.
>
>Conclusions. The hatmic held its own against the ME-62 and beat the
>SASS-P.
>
>For the proof it is a 6.2 meg download.
>http://home.comcast.net/~richpeet/test.wav
>
>Rich Peet
>
>
>
>
>
>
>"Microphones are not ears,
>Loudspeakers are not birds,
>A listening room is not nature."
>Klas Strandberg
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
--
Rob Danielson
Film Department
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
>From Tue Mar 8 18:28:15 2005
Message: 11=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 00:27:54 -0000
From: "Rich Peet" <>
Subject: Re: hat mic
Test results.
As the hat mic was the only unbalanced mic I should mention that I
did have to unplug other audio devices in the room to kill all hum.=20
I also had to build a battery box to get the hat mic into my quadmic
preamp so signal did go through an additional 1uf tantilum cap.
All three mics were recording at the same time using the same a/d
converter and same preamp. Recorded in 24 bit. All three mics were
within 3 inches of each other all pointed at the same direction. The
traffic noise is at 90 degrees to the front.
1. Sennheiser ME-62
2. Hat mic, only one channel recorded
3. SASS-P, only one channel recorded.
Conclusions. The hatmic held its own against the ME-62 and beat the
SASS-P.
For the proof it is a 6.2 meg download.
http://home.comcast.net/~richpeet/test.wav
Rich Peet
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
|