naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: Everlasting recordings?

Subject: Re: Re: Everlasting recordings?
From: Walter Knapp <>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 01:43:31 -0400
tony baylis wrote:
> Lots of interesting thoughts on this topic.  It is
> comendable to archive for the future.  Unfortunately
> it may be that the individual is not the best bet for
> real longevity.  National sound archives should have
> the resources to ensure that future generations get to
> hear the way the world is now.  Make sure that any
> recordings that you make which YOU think are important
> are lodged with a archive somewhere.
> Tony Baylis. 

Large archives have made the same errors as individuals. It would be 
well if you are really serious to investigate the history and practices 
of the archives you are considering. Check and see just how many of the 
older recordings in their archives they can still play, such like.

Walt




________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU