naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: idea for National Park Service

Subject: Re: idea for National Park Service
From: Walter Knapp <>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 02:40:16 -0400
Dan Dugan wrote:
> Walt, you wrote,
>
>
>>If you read Bioacoustics L for a while as I did til I could stand it no
>>more you would know. They are almost worse than the lawyers.
>
>
> That isn't encouraging.
>
>
>>However, if you are talking to more practical scientists, myself
>>included, I see no problem technically. Just as I said, make sure it
>>never has to go to court, or be looked at by the bioacoustics crowd, or
>>try to publish it in one of the bioacoustics journals.
>
>
> I was hoping by having a panel of recognized experts design the
> protocol to gain some acceptability...

Good luck, the experts tend to be pretty closed minded to anything new.

Walt




________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU