naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Nagra avoirdupois

Subject: Re: Nagra avoirdupois
From: Syd Curtis <>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 22:29:09 +1000
Thanks for Nagra vital statistics.  I'll probably be proved wrong but I
reckon Nagra's been on a diet since the '60s.

My old Uhers are approx. 10 X 8 X 3 inches and I reckon the '60s Nagra
looked substantially larger.

The Tascam DAT I now use is 10.2 X 7.4 X 2.1 inches - not all that much
smaller in area than the Nagra V, but only half as thick.  And at 1.44 kg (3
lbs?) including battery, appreciably lighter.

Syd


> From: "oryoki2000 <>" <>
> Reply-To: 
> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 00:26:02 -0000
> To: 
> Subject: [Nature Recordists] Nagra avoirdupois
> 
> Syd Curtis asked:
> 
>> How heavy is this wonderful Nagra V?
> 
> The Nagra V documentation says:
> dimensions  11.4 x 8.6 x 4.5 inches
> weight        6 lbs without battery
> 7.75 lb with battery pack
> 
> The HHB Portadisc:
> dimensions  10 x  7.1 in x 2.2 inches
> weight        4.5 lb with battery pack
> 
> 
> --oryoki
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
> 



________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Nagra avoirdupois, oryoki2000 <oryoki@muchomail.com>
    • Re: Nagra avoirdupois, Syd Curtis <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU