naturerecordists
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Digital over mod? was:New to list and interested in grasshop=

Subject: Re: Digital over mod? was:New to list and interested in grasshop=
From: Walter Knapp <>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 20:59:08 -0400
pers

hilly512000 wrote:
> Hi there,
> This IS geting intresting. I am going to assume that you guys are now
> using some form of digital decording medium. Is there any chance that
> the process of analog to digital, then in the case of mini-disc,
> compression and later de-compression, and the digital to analog
> conversion so that we can listen to the signal again, would introduce
> some sort of minute distortions? Is it also possible that the Mini-
> disc compression leaves out something vital because it "thinks"
> that "this little bit is not needed"?
> I guess I am old fassioned but sometimes it takes me a while to
> completely trust new technology.
> Still learning,
> Dennis

Yes, of course, it's all the fault of ATRAC. It even causes our ears to
hear the same thing before we record, and causes DAT, reel to reel and
cassette to make the same recording error by remote control. Not sure if
it also did it to wire recording. Sony is out to get us all.

This has been around for at least 50 years that I personally know of. I
first observed this with my own ears before I started High School. And
in tape recordings.

My guess is it's been around since animals started making sounds. Or
with non animal sounds before that. Thunderstorms even do this.

BTW, minidisc records it in a very detailed fashion. It must "think"
it's important. That is if a piece of silicon can think.

You don't want me to take apart the old technology do you? I've
personally used it all from wire recorder on. Every recording technology
invented introduces minute distortions. The older stuff introduces great
big distortions.

I know that reality does sometimes closely resemble the biggest error of
all, but this is reality. The animals really sound like that.

The question I have is do we use ID clips that include the
multi-individual call sounds or just the "pure" single calls. We are
going to have all out frog chorus tracks as well just to make sure it's
completely confusing. But we start out being semi nice with just the
single species calls. Or as close to that as luck and filtering can do.

Walt





________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU