| Subject: | MP3 / WMA / AAC comparison |
|---|---|
| From: | "oryoki2000" <> |
| Date: | Fri, 12 Jul 2002 17:28:37 -0000 |
This morning I noticed an interesting article comparing music compression software. The author compressed a WAV file using MP3, WMA and AAC, set to sample at 128Kbps.=20 The results are displayed using CoolEdit's frequency analyzer. See the graphs at http://www.tomshardware.com/consumer/02q3/020712/2u4u-05.html In this example, the AAC file did a much better job of capturing the 15-20KHz frequency range of the WAV file. The AAC file subjectively sounded best, too.=20 Can anyone share results of a similar frequency analysis comparing WAV with flavors of ATRAC?=20 ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: used equipment, Doug Von Gausig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re: ATRAC compression, Dan Dugan |
| Previous by Thread: | Thunder Recordings, Doug Von Gausig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MP3 / WMA / AAC comparison, Dan Dugan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the naturerecordists mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU