canberrabirds

Birds of the ACT - Two centuries of change A question

To: 'Geoffrey Dabb' <>, "" <>
Subject: Birds of the ACT - Two centuries of change A question
From: Philip Veerman <>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 10:39:32 +0000

I wonder how many new species have been added since that book.......  Also it is curious that the issue of species that have allegedly declined or disappeared (the opposite of ‘rare to abundant’), over that period, has not been mentioned............. Only increases.

 

A species can be a ‘non-breeding resident’ if in the fairly small area of ACT, some individuals of the species (maybe not the same ones) are present all year but the species is not known to breed in the ACT. I don’t know an example.

 

Philip

 

From: Geoffrey Dabb [ Sent: Monday, 20 August, 2018 4:17 PM           To:        Subject: FW: [canberrabirds] Birds of the ACT - Two centuries of change A question

 

Yes, among the local increasers the Superb Parrot has certainly graduated from ‘rare visitor’, and the Koel from ‘rare non-breeding migrant’.  ‘An uncommon species’ no longer accurately describes the very numerous Little Corella.  ‘Non-breeding’ to ‘breeding’ might just be a matter of a recent nest record, but the nesting  Silver Gulls on LBG have made a dramatic entry into the ‘breeding’ category. The idea of a ‘non-breeding resident’ does seem to leave an unanswered question.    To take up Philip’s point it is a philosophical issue whether ‘rare to abundant’ is a more significant change than ‘never recorded to now recorded ’ (eg Long-toed Stint’,  White-cheeked Honeyeater, Tawny Grassbird) or ‘locally extinct to not-extinct (rare visitor)’ (eg Banded Lapwing’).   

 

From: Philip Veerman <> Sent: Sunday, 19 August 2018 3:35 PM               To: 'Geoffrey Dabb' <>
Subject: RE: [canberrabirds] Birds of the ACT - Two centuries of change A question

 

Don’t forget the Canary (mentioned as only one record).

 

Yes plus Crested Pigeon, Rainbow Lorikeet, Satin Bowerbird. Although the increases so obvious now were at least hinted at by SW back then. Or to give a simple answer to the question it can be qualitative, rather than quantitative and include all those species of which we have a record now, that were not in the book at all, not thought likely at the time-------- Red Knot, White-fronted Honeyeater, etc.

 

Philip

 

From: Martin Butterfield [ Sent: Sunday, 19 August, 2018 12:16 PM  To: Geoffrey Dabb         Cc: COG List
Subject: Re: FW: [canberrabirds] Birds of the ACT - Two centuries of change A question

 

I suggest a tie between Superb Parrot and <whatever qualifier is in use this week> Koel.


Martin Butterfield

http://franmart.blogspot.com.au/

 

 

From: Geoffrey Dabb [m("iinet.net.au","gdabb");">] Sent: Sunday, 19 August, 2018 11:59 AM          To: m("canberrabirds.org.au","canberrabirds");">
Subject: FW: [canberrabirds] Birds of the ACT - Two centuries of change A question

 

The cut-off date for this invaluable publication was more than 20 years ago.   Having regard to reports since then, which bird species has a local occurrence that differs most markedly from the assessment by Steve Wilson in 1999?  (There are several candidates.)

 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Birds of the ACT - Two centuries of change A question, Philip Veerman <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email . If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU