canberrabirds

Thoughts on the 2 local ravens (3) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

To: Geoffrey Dabb <>
Subject: Thoughts on the 2 local ravens (3) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
From: Dennis Ayliffe <>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 04:53:21 +0000
Speaking of ravens, my golfing partner and I were both “ravenned” at the Duntroon course this morning. One sat in a tree near the 2nd tee and followed my ball after I hit it, picking it up  (not from the green sadly) and flying off towards Morsehead Drive. My partner’s drive on the 7th hole was treated similarly except the bird headed off towards the playing fields to the north of Fairbairn Avenue. We didn’t think it was the same bird.
On 16 Jun 2017, at 12:41 pm, Geoffrey Dabb <> wrote:

Dennis Ayliffe

Thanks Harvey and David.  When this comes up I think of Ben King’s (Birds of SE Asia) description of how to measure total length of a live bird.  An extract is as follows.
 
m("01D2E69D.D7A53C70","image001.jpg");"><image001.jpg>
 
Note the  ‘gently and slowly, without pulling too hard’.  [!!! – remember to involve an assistant for egrets and pelicans, maybe for a Great Crested Grebe even]  The reference to a ‘curved neck measurement’ is to a beak-tail measurement with the neck in one of the conceivable curved positions that is perhaps what you might get by applying the scale in the field guide to the bird as illustrated.  Applying the given scale to the raven illustrations in ABG we have an unstretched A Rav of 43.5cm (cf HANZAB 46-53) Little Rav 41.2 (HANZAB 48-52).  But did HANZAB ever do any serious stretching – or only make an estimate of stretched length?  Length is only included as a ‘general indication’ of size.
 
Another way to do it in a popular field guide is as in this US guide, the following indicating size of the Common Poorwill –
 
m("01D2E69D.D7A53C70","image006.jpg");"><image006.jpg>
 
 
From: Perkins, Harvey  
Sent: Friday, 16 June 2017 11:17 AM
To: 'David Rees'; Geoffrey Dabb
Subject: RE: [canberrabirds] Thoughts on the 2 local ravens (3) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
 
 
In contrast to most field guides (as opposed to handbooks), measurements are included for wing length, bill length and weight. These are probably less useful to the average birder than the more typical indication of total body length, whatever shortcomings that might have. 
 
Harvey
 
Dr Harvey Perkins
CRC Programme Operations
AusIndustry – Business Services
 
Phone +61 2 6213 7472
Internet: business.gov.au
 
 
 
 
From: David Rees  
Sent: Friday, 16 June 2017 11:06 AM
To: Geoffrey Dabb <>
Cc: <> <m("canberrabirds.org.au","canberrabirds");" style="color: purple; text-decoration: underline;" class="">>
Subject: Re: [canberrabirds] Thoughts on the 2 local ravens (3)
 
The point you make about lack of 'bird-length' is in my view one of the deficiencies of the new CSIRO field guide.  While the wing, beak etc. measurements are absolute data, however, they are of little use on their own to an 'observer'. Most customers of this field guide will be observers.  Case of 'purity' over 'practicality' here.
 
The new book seems to me to be a close copy of the format used by Svensson et al (1999) in their European field guide, first published in Sweden, but probably better known to readers in its English language edition published by Collins as the 'Bird Guide ......"  It seems a pity to me that CSIRO Publishing did not follow the size format used for that book, which is far more compact and field friendly.  See what I mean in photo enclosed
 
That said, the artwork in the new field guide is magnificent, and probably the best out there from anywhere and the artists and authors should be congratulated for that.
 
David
 
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Geoffrey Dabb <> wrote:
Bird length is not a straightforward matter.  Most field guides give it as offering some kind of help in appreciating size.  The Australian Bird Guide departs from that practice, giving instead wing, bill length and weight (these generally taken from HANZAB). Among the reasons for not giving length: ‘the measurement [is] typically taken from dead specimens  stretched into positions that are never assumed in life.  Trying to reconcile the total lengths presented in books with those observed in the field can therefore be confusing.’  (ABG does offer a scale on the illustration pages.)  HANZAB does not give tabulated lengths in the Plumages section but does provide length in the field identification section ‘in gross terms, as a guide to the size of the bird’.  
 
Bearing in mind that warning, the following given ‘lengths’ (cms) might be noted:
 
Aust Raven:  HANZAB 46-53;  Pizzey 48-52
Little Raven:  HANZAB 48-52;  Pizzey  48-50
 
>From weights and other size info in HANZAB it is clear that males are larger than females so a female A Rav might be no bigger than (or even smaller than) an individual Little Raven.  
 
Relative sizes might only be an issue if you see both species together – and particularly if you are counting species.  The below is a selection of snaps from Trucking Yard Lane last week when a single A Rav was squabbling with 4-5 Little Ravens at the remains of a deceased duck.  You can correct my tentative labelling, if you like.

Dennis Ayliffe
0400168825



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Thoughts on the 2 local ravens (3) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL], Dennis Ayliffe <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email . If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU