|To:||Harold Schranz <>|
|Subject:||How Many Birds Are Killed By Wind, Solar, Oil, And Coal?|
|From:||David Rees <>|
|Date:||Fri, 29 Aug 2014 10:46:01 +1000|
re threats to birds and other wildlife
Think we need to be careful re energy sources, we are all at fault with our cars, need for gas, electricity and the like. I would rather see more solar, algal diesel plants etc.etc. in this sunny country even if a few birds are killed than the alternative - coal, fossil oil, oil shale etc.etc. In Canberra we don't have to face the reality of those industries on a daily basis so we get a bit negative when anyone builds anything - such as a solar farm - the one down on the Monaro probably has less impact on the environment than the DFO and actually will provide something useful.
Re cats - I think their impact on birds is over-done in Australia (unlike NZ), except for sea-bird and wader colonies and birds (and small mammals) already made critically rare by other means - mainly direct human - and where they have a significant effect on population recovery. Impact on other creatures, such as small reptiles is probably much greater, and under worked. The Forde/Bonner test could provide data for impact on suburban birds relative to suburbs nearby where no such controls are in place. Would be interesting reading, my bet is that little difference will be seen to populations of species usually found in suburbs in terms of species diversity and density, though birds will get seen to be taken. Wonder about the skink populations though? But then there are currawongs and collisions with cars etc. etc. - i.e. we live in a dynamic environment. Yes, some blue wrens which now live at my place probably get eaten by local cats, however the only reason they are there is that gardens (mine certainly does) now provide them cover and, in spite of predation, they thrive. They were unlikely have been here in the middle of a open sheep paddock that was here 10 years ago. In other words its dynamic. None of like seeing a blue wren eaten by a domestic cat - but that act in isolation may make little difference to the outcome for the population in a Canberra suburb relative to all the other things going on.
I do support the containment policy there as it will reduce number of prowling animals in Mulligans Flat and it improves animal welfare. Disclosure - I own two desexed, chipped, rescued moggies from the RSPCA which are contained even though I live in a Gungahlin suburb where they don't need to be, Currently they are both setting, one each side, watching me pen this email - one of the many reasons why folk have them.
Re cat bells - cans learn how to move silently - I've got one (ex feral kitten) who is a master, bells and all. Would love to know what sound frequency the 'sonar beeper' is expected to work at for birds - given that cats have highly attuned high frequency hearing - for the hunting of mice and the like.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Harold Schranz <> wrote:
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Musk Lorikets still in Hughes, calyptorhynchus .|
|Next by Date:||Help: Yellow rumped thornbill nests, Iliana Medina Guzmán|
|Previous by Thread:||How Many Birds Are Killed By Wind, Solar, Oil, And Coal?, Harold Schranz|
|Next by Thread:||RE: ACT's Cat Containment Policy, Baird, Ian|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email . If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: email@example.com.EDU.AU