There's no doubt it was an intriguing bird and a very
difficult and, to me, unresolved identification. My first
impression was that it was an adult female Golden Whistler, but
as we watched a range of features became apparent that were not
typical of Golden Whistler. The notes I wrote up as soon as I
got home and before delving into the literature are:
"Probably at upper end of size range for a
Golden
Whistler. Generally “full-bodied” (less slender than a
Rufous Whistler).
Head and back grey (more slate grey rather
than brown-grey), with
little/no distinction between head/nape and mantle/back.
Paler edging to
secondaries, but no hint of rufous. In good light and
angle a slight olive wash
to outer secondaries. Small white patch/streak over alular
area.
Throat noticeably pale, but diffusely
rather than sharply
or strongly demarcated from breast, and with very light
grey spotting effect
(not noticeably streaks or scallops). Breast light buff
but washed darker or with
slight pale rufousness on sides, grading to pale buff
abdomen and vent. Small well
defined patch of grey feathers above thighs (upper tibia),
continuing as small
light rufous patch extending a little backwards and
downwards towards vent. This
was very obvious and is not a feature of any Australian
whistler. No yellow
seen around cloaca.
Both upper and lower mandible dark grey,
no obvious paler
base.
Behaviour – moving from tree to tree,
branch to branch,
looking about – typical whistler behaviour.
No vocalisation heard. "
The grey and rufous feathering over the
tibia was both very obvious and persistent (in that it
remained after several flights between branches and trees,
so I don't think it was just exposed ruffled feather bases
(it had a similar, though reversed, effect to the white
patch on the thigh of a breeding plumaged Great
Cormorant). And while the bill was stout, I didn't think
anything of it at the time and the head and bill overall
had a fairly typical Golden Whistler jizz to me. The bird
seemed quite unconcerned as we watched it for several
minutes from a distance of probably 10-20 metres.
To me it was undoubtedly very unusual for
a female Golden Whistler, but nor could I convince myself
that it was anything else. I've not seen a female
Gilbert's Whistler (I have seen a male Gilbert's in the
hand), but I feel that the features of the bird we saw
would have been just as aberrant for a Gilbert's female as
they were for a female Golden; and when you add the
distribution aspect...
Unfortunately neither of us had a camera
with us, but to be frank, I'm not sure how much it would
have helped!
Harvey