On 8/01/2011 4:28 PM, Philip Veerman wrote:
Message
Sort of
sounds interesting. Do others see an unfortunate possible
ambiguity here? In that "frequency" has two meanings of
relevance. In this case by context it appears to mean how
often something occurs in time, not the sound frequency, as
in what we hear as pitch. But then again maybe it is both,
in the same way that playing a tape faster raises the
pitch...........
I don't think there should be any ambiguity, Philip. The paper uses
"frequency"
when referring to differences in pitch, and "syllable rate" for
temporal (time)
differences. Changes in pitch with tape speed is an artifact of the
recording
method; a better analogy is the speed of a metronome that a musician
plays to.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Paul Taylor Veni, vidi, tici -
m("ozemail.com.au","birder");"> I came, I saw, I ticked.
|
|
