more on land-use, vegetation and avifaunal patterns

To: COG line <>
Subject: more on land-use, vegetation and avifaunal patterns
From: Robin Hide <>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:41:11 +1100
This new paper seems to speak to some of the issues raised in recent emails..
Robin Hide

Camilleri, S., J. R. Thomson and R. M. Nally (2010). “The interaction between land use and catchment physiognomy: understanding avifaunal patterns of the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia.” Journal of Biogeography 37(2): 293 - 304.
Keywords: Australia • biodiversity • bird atlas • birds • catchment • multivariate correlations • watershed
Aim We assessed whether different patterns of land use within similar physiognomic catchments (= watersheds) produced discernible effects on avian assemblages and, if so, whether such effects were related to particular land-use activities (e.g. extensive cropping).
Location Murray-Darling Basin in south-eastern Australia.
Methods We used a recently (2007) published physiognomic classification of catchments based on different stream orders as our template. We used a subset of data from the second Birds Australia atlas to calculate reporting rates for each species in each subcatchment. We linked these two sets of data with proportions of major land uses within catchments to identify whether differences in proportions of land uses altered the expected avifauna for catchments of the same nominal physiognomic class.
Results A significant proportion of the variation in bird reporting rates was explained by the physiognomic classification. Additional explanatory power resulted from including an interaction matrix of land-use covariates. Livestock grazing was a major explanatory variable in classes characterized by more mountainous catchments. Cropping affected avifaunas consistently by producing a more uniform assemblage.
Main conclusions The physiognomic template was an important determinant of avifaunal composition, but its interaction with land-use variation within physiognomic classes doubled the amount of variance explained. Within a physiognomic class, if one identifies the 'ideal' avifaunal composition for that class one can identify land-use mixes that are most likely to be beneficial for the avifaunas of that class and recommend directions for large-scale management objectives vis-à-vis mixtures of land-use types.
Copyright © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Correspondence to *Ralph Mac Nally, Australian Centre for Biodiversity, School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic. 3800, Australia.
E-mail: m("","ralph.macnally");"> m("","ralph.macnally");"><>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email . If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU