Degrees of difficulty (1)

To: <>
Subject: Degrees of difficulty (1)
From: "Geoffrey Dabb" <>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:16:22 +1100
As I understand the loose rules applying to tickability, this is a matter of
personal choice.  My view is:  of course they will be ticked by anyone who
attaches any importance to increasing their ticks.  Go ahead.   I believe
Mat has ticked the Egyptian Goose.    g 

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Friday, 18 January 2008 11:37 AM
Subject: Degrees of difficulty (1)

On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 10:31:15AM +1100, Geoffrey Dabb wrote:
> Peachicks, this morning.  Very easy.  Note the emerging crests.
> Surprisingly all the original 9 have survived, so far.

Given their breeding success and the length of time they've been
present in the ACT, are these considered to be tickable?

   Paul Taylor                           Veni, vidi, tici -
                    I came, I saw, I ticked.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email . If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU