terminology on abundance and recording rate

Subject: terminology on abundance and recording rate
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:33:10 +1100

Philip. I was the one who made that statement. I think I had already written too much. I believe we are arguing the same thing.

I was trying to separate out the theoretical likelihood of a person with perfect knowledge seeing a bird at a site. Which is my interpretation of COGs 'commonness' or abundance. Vs COGs 'recorded' observations (Martins satin flycatcher problem). And also vs the status of a bird species as a whole, eg threatened.





From: Philip Veerman [
Sent: Sunday, 13 March 2005 4:41 PM
Subject: [canberrabirds] terminology on abundance and recording rate

Someone suggested that "The first words (rare, common) refer to the likelihood of seeing a species in the ACT." I dispute that the word "common" means (or should mean) "high frequency of being seen" (this being another term for recording rate, except based on just the visual). That is only a consequence. "Common" or not, should indicate population density (or abundance). In contrast, recording rate is something entirely different.
The first example that comes to mind is not a bird: The program "Big Cat Diary" often makes the point that the leopard is by far the most common of the 3 big cats in Africa, although it is much less often seen than the other two, the lion and cheetah and that is because of their behaviour. Back to local birds. The GBS Reports (pages 31 to 34) discuss this aspect in detail. With graphs for 12 species comparing the monthly abundance from the GBS to the monthly recording rate during the same 3 year period of the COG Atlas, with accompanying text that explains why in some species the graphs look similar and in others they are quite different. It relates to habitat use changes and social behaviour changes over the year.
The GBS happens to highlight these things with the A value, R value and number of records (which on one year is the F value) statistics. It is wrong to think there is a direct correlation between the abundance, observability and recording rate, except in the crudest sense.  My GBS Report presents a graph (Figure 33) of the relationship between recording rate and abundance for all species on each year. I called it "probably the most important result of the GBS". It is explained therein that the relationship varies mainly according to the social behaviour of the species concerned. Recording rate is strongly influenced by visual and sound conspicuousness of the bird or its behaviour. Not to mention the enthusiasm of people to submit records. Looking at the ABR, one would think many species that we know to be common, appear to be rare, because people are not interested to record them. But when we do get a Lewin's Rail at Commonwealth Park it may appear on that scale to be almost common, as many people go to see it, so it potentially has a high recording rate. Recording rate does not distinguish between obvious species occurring at low densities and inconspicuous species occurring at higher densities. I encounter the Wedge-tailed Eagle far more often than the Yellow Thornbill but I am sure there will be more of the latter in the ACT. Even though biomass, as in grams per hectare may favour the eagle!


IMPORTANT - This message has been issued by The Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF). The information transmitted is for the use of the intended recipient only and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged material. It is your responsibility to check any attachments for viruses and defects before opening or sending them on.

Any reproduction, publication, communication, re-transmission, disclosure, dissemination or other use of the information contained in this e-mail by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. The taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender and delete all copies of this transmission together with any attachments. If you have received this e-mail as part of a valid mailing list and no longer want to receive a message such as this one advise the sender by return e-mail accordingly. Only e-mail correspondence which includes this footer, has been authorised by DAFF


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Canberra Ornithologists Group mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the list contact David McDonald, list manager, phone (02) 6231 8904 or email . If you can not contact David McDonald e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU