birding-aus

Birding-Aus Digest, Vol 76, Issue 8

To: "" <>
Subject: Birding-Aus Digest, Vol 76, Issue 8
From: Michael Hunter <>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 06:06:16 +1100
     The Botanic Gardens Scientists and Seed Bank are doings a truly wonderful 
job. 
    Obviously more on-ground research in burned areas, particularly those which 
were previously unburned  in living history, needs to be done for many years in 
order to monitor all kinds of regeneration of plants and animals.
     
     I am pessimistic. There seems to be an underlying assumption that weather 
will return to what it used to be, effectively denying that a progressively 
warmer world is on the way, and that drought adapted species will replace much 
of the existing highish rainfall flora and fauna, even without fires.  Fires 
will accelerate the process, which has been happening for millennia if our 
understanding of Geological history is correct. Much of Australia was once 
covered by forest .
    The fact is that our climate has been changing over decades  rather than 
hundred s or thousands of years will irrevocably change much of our landscape 
and native plants and animals.
     Our fires and floods and those all over the globe may convert some 
non-believers, but will it not be in time, even if rationale and sanity 
prevailed tomorrow.
    Adaptation will be the name of the game, associated with terrible losses of 
all forms of life, increasing suffering and human anguish.

    Although too late really, reversing the uncontrolled increase in human 
numbers, and/or the embrace of, now available, clean Nuclear Power to water and 
feed them all without more warming,  are in my opinion the only realistic 
solutions.  Both unlikely , so enjoy what we have while we can.

              Very Sincerely

                 Michael

PS re Woodpeckers, look up
Wallaces Line which geographically separates Northern and Southern Hemisphere 
species .

Sent from my iPhone

> On 15 Feb 2020, at 4:00 am,  wrote:
> 
> Send Birding-Aus mailing list submissions to
>    
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Birding-Aus digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: Land of the smokey bears (Stephen Ambrose)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:32:42 +1100
> From: "Stephen Ambrose" <>
> To: <>
> Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Land of the smokey bears
> Message-ID: <>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> 
> 
> Just to add to this discussion, Brett Summerell (Director of Research and
> Chief Botanist at Sydney's Royal Botanic Gardens) estimates that between 3
> billion and 7 billion trees have burnt so far this season in Australian
> bushfires. I don't know how much this translates into loss of tree hollows
> or, indeed, the creation or hastening of the creation of new ones.
> 
> https://theplanthunter.com.au/botanica/seven-billion-burnt-trees/?fbclid=IwA
> R2-bNrTYGHWgUXmmt_yAag8qdCO9OX66s3j2DlG3FEx6cq_66_t8sAeVIg
> 
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Stephen
> 
> 
> 
> Stephen Ambrose
> 
> Ryde, NSW
> 
> 
> 
> From: Birding-Aus <> On Behalf Of Philip
> Veerman
> Sent: 9 February 2020 4:35 PM
> To: 
> Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Land of the smokey bears
> 
> 
> 
> I can understand the observation Chris makes. If a tree with hollows burns,
> the hollow may allow the fire to cause increased damage (compared to a solid
> tree) and may make the tree more likely to collapse. Or it may just be that
> trees with hollows are older and thus more likely to fall over, than younger
> trees and that is the difference. 
> 
> 
> 
> Even so, I am not convinced that fires might not speed up the hollow forming
> process in previously healthy trees. I am not advocating fires for that
> purpose!
> 
> 
> 
> An easier and far more obvious reason Australia doesn't have woodpeckers is
> that they are a northern hemisphere group that have never arrived here. For
> the same reason, other parts of the world don't have many of our bird
> groups. We also don't have vultures, laughing-thrushes, toucans, shrikes,
> etc....
> 
> 
> 
> Philip
> 
> 
> 
> From: Birding-Aus  On Behalf Of
> Penny Brockman
> Sent: Sunday, 9 February, 2020 4:13 PM
> To:  <> 
> Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Land of the smokey bears
> 
> 
> 
> I remember reading somewhere the reason Australia doesn't have woodpeckers
> is that we don't have trees which are suitable for them to hammer their
> bills into. Even the rainforest trees don't on the whole suit woodpeckers.
> I'm ready to be nay-sayed on this!!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 9/02/2020 3:02 PM, Chris Corben wrote:
> 
> Someone with more expertise than me should answer that. 
> 
> What I have seen numerous times is that even low intensity burns can
> selectively cause trees with hollows in them to fall over, while having
> little apparent effect on younger trees. 
> 
> Cheers, Chris. 
> 
> 
> 
> On 2/8/2020 9:44 PM, Philip Veerman wrote: 
> 
> 
> About "if you just think of the loss of hollow trees, which happens as a
> result of ANY burning." Yes that may well be true but can it also be the
> case that fires might increase the amount of available hollows in trees by
> damaging trees and allowing hollows to form in trees before the process of
> hollow formation would normally happen due to aging. Just asking.... 
> 
> Philip 
> 
> *From:*Birding-Aus  *On Behalf
> Of *Chris Corben 
> *Sent:* Sunday, 9 February, 2020 2:26 PM 
> *To:*  <>  
> *Subject:* Re: [Birding-Aus] Land of the smokey bears 
> 
> In the USA, I have heard many people speak about the importance of regular
> burning to improve and protect habitats. As an Australian, this has always
> felt odd to me, though recently I have read some material suggesting that in
> the USA this view is changing. In any case, the Australian landscape is very
> different, even if you just think about the extreme importance of hollows in
> old trees for wildlife, which is far more significant in Australia than
> elsewhere. And Australia doesn't have Woodpeckers! I also note that in the
> USA, many habitats we see have been hugely modified by Native American
> burning, so that there is perceived value in returning it to that state, not
> to any prehuman state. It is a complicated mess, but at least in Australia,
> if you just think of the loss of hollow trees, which happens as a result of
> ANY burning, (not to mention hazard tree removal!), it is easy to conclude
> that fire needs to be thought through very carefully and not controlled by
> knee-jerk reactions to particular events. 
> 
> Cheers, Chris. 
> 
> On 2/8/2020 6:36 PM, Geoffrey Dabb wrote: 
> 
>    I found the below link about the now slightly contentious , 
>    perhaps outdated, Smokey Bear, an emblem of the agency in the 
>    United States that manages National Parks  -  real national parks, 
>    that is, not like our State-managed parks that are labelled 
>    'National' in imitation of those Americans.  Some entertain the 
>    idea that some quite large wildfires should be allowed to burn 
>    unchecked to avoid really serious fires.  I don't believe the 
>    'thinking' in Australia has gone quite that far, but we are going 
>    to hear quite a lot about beneficial controlled fires, a subject 
>    complicated by the absence of a national agency with any 
>    responsibility in this area. 
> 
> 
> https://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/entry/smokey-bear-75th-birthday-legacy_n_5
> dc5cf48e4b0fcfb7f662fda?ri18n=true
> 
> Chris Corben. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> <HR>
> <BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
> <BR>  <> 
> <BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
> <BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
> </HR>
> 
> 
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://birding-aus.org/mailman/private/birding-aus_birding-aus.org/attachments/20200214/3a10d3c6/attachment.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Birding-Aus mailing list
> 
> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of Birding-Aus Digest, Vol 76, Issue 8
> ******************************************

<HR>
<BR> Birding-Aus mailing list
<BR> 
<BR> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
<BR> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
</HR>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Birding-Aus Digest, Vol 76, Issue 8, Michael Hunter <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU