birding-aus
|
To: | Birding Aus <> |
---|---|
Subject: | An unfortunate way to tick a Frogmouth |
From: | Joseph Morlan <> |
Date: | Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:06:11 -0700 |
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 08:20:07 +1030, martin cachard <> wrote: >I think it's pretty simple really, & I've always been puzzled when records of >dead seabirds for eg are counted as records but observers in the main don't >tick them... >it seems very inconsistent to me - a record is a record, surely!! I suspect it's because ticking is not science; it's a sport. Counting dead birds is not sportsmanlike because the bird has no chance of escaping or getting away. It would be like a hunter claiming "credit" for shooting a duck that was already dead? But ultimately it's your list unless you are in a competition. -- Joseph Morlan, Pacifica, CA "It turns out we're very good at not seeing things" - Jack Hitt _______________________________________________ Birding-Aus mailing list To change settings or unsubscribe visit: http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Eaglehawk Pelagic Trip Report, May 24th 2014, Paul Brooks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | An unfortunate way to tick a Frogmouth, Chris Corben |
Previous by Thread: | An unfortunate way to tick a Frogmouth, Tony Russell |
Next by Thread: | An unfortunate way to tick a Frogmouth, Chris Corben |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU