birding-aus

Petitions

To: Dave Torr <>
Subject: Petitions
From: David Clark <>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 12:23:39 +1000
>From my experience with Ministers' offices, communications from the public
are considered in terms of potential votes for and against.  A petition,
regardless of how many signatories, was considered to represent 20 votes.
A letter was 5 votes, so 4 letters carried the same weight as a petition.
However, campaign letters are not treated as seriously as one-off letters
from concerned citizens.

The best chance of influencing politicians will come from individual
letters or emails that reflect concern about an issue rather than being
part of a campaign to change something.

Cheers

David


On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Dave Torr <> wrote:

> I agree - and that was in the old days when a petition was the result of
> hard work standing outside shopping centres etc and where there was a
> reasonable chance that at least some of the names were accurate!
> Now a politician would have no idea if the petitioners were even "local" to
> the area (or even if they were real people!) - and whilst of course anyone
> is entitled to have a view on a subject even if they don't live in the area
> a politician usually responds only if they feel that their chance of
> re-election may be affected!
>
>
> On 8 May 2014 11:12, david robertson <> wrote:
>
> > The problem with petitions is that although they create a feel-good
> > feeling,
> > they don't work.  I remember the late Don Chip, who was then the leader
> of
> > the Democrats, describing what happened to petitions.  They are wheeled
> in
> > to Parliament just before the start of Parliamentary business for the
> day.
> > The MPs are studying the order of business  and chatting to each other.
>  A
> > MP moves that permission be granted to receive the petition.  Permission
> is
> > granted.
> >
> > They are then wheeled away to the basement and never heard of again.
>  'But
> > I
> > tell you, if any politician receives 50 individual letters (not form
> ones),
> > he will be in my office next morning, saying "You must do something about
> > X.
> > There's a groundswell out there.."
> >
> > The solution is obvious.
> >
> > David Robertson
> >
> > Adelaide
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Birding-Aus mailing list
> > 
> > To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Birding-Aus mailing list
> 
> To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
> http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org
>
_______________________________________________
Birding-Aus mailing list

To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU