birding-aus

Great Barrier Reef dumping

To: Mark Stanley <>, <>
Subject: Great Barrier Reef dumping
From: Denise Goodfellow <>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 12:55:24 +0930
I meant ³waste² in the sense of ³unwanted² although I could have used
³sludge¹ as many reports have.  But my understanding is that much of this
³dredge spoil² is actually sand, and therefore the latter term may be
inaccurate. 

Incidentally one definition of the noun ³spoil² is ³waste material brought
up during the course of an excavation or a dredging or mining operation²
<http://www.google.com.au/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=³dredge+spoil²+defin
ition&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&gfe_rd=cr&ei=tgnvUqaDBsON8QfCx4GQBw#q=³spoil²+defini
tion&rls=en>

Denise Lawungkurr Goodfellow
PO Box 71,  Darwin River,
NT 0841
043 8650 835

PhD candidate, SCU
Vice-chair, Wildlife Tourism Australia





On 3/2/14 12:10 PM, "Mark Stanley" <> wrote:

> Like a lot of environmental issues, I am left wondering where the truth lies
> here. Is this an appalling decision that will wreck the reef?  Or does the
> counter argument hold, that a typical cyclone raises and redistributes x-times
> this amount of sediment so the reef will deal with it?  One would hope (am I
> naive?) that the Great Barrier Marine Park Authority understand the issue and
> would not approve if the dredging on its own was likely to cause irreversible
> damage to the reef. They say:
>  
> "After rigorous assessment, the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority has
> approved an application by North Queensland Bulk Ports Corporation to dispose
> of dredge spoil at a deep water location offshore of Abbot Point, subject to
> strict environmental conditions.
> Authority Chairman, Dr Russell Reichelt, said he recognised the amount of
> debate and community concern that the project had generated and shared with
> everyone a strong desire to ensure the Reef remains a great natural wonder
> into the future.
> 
> ³This approval is in line with the agency¹s view that port development along
> the Great Barrier Reef coastline should be limited to existing ports,² Dr
> Reichelt said.
> 
> ³As a deepwater port that has been in operation for nearly 30 years, Abbot
> Point is better placed than other ports along the Great Barrier Reef coastline
> to undertake expansion as the capital and maintenance dredging required will
> be significantly less than what would be required in other areas.
> 
> ³It¹s important to note the seafloor of the approved disposal area consists of
> sand, silt and clay and does not contain coral reefs or seagrass beds.²
> 
> General Manager for Biodiversity, Conservation and Sustainable Use, Bruce
> Elliot said the stringent environmental conditions imposed on the dredge
> disposal would help protect biodiversity, heritage and social values of the
> multi-use Marine Park and ensure potential impacts of this activity are
> avoided, mitigated or offset."
> I suspect the bigger issue is the reason behind the dredging which is to
> export massively more coal with significant local environmental impacts (there
> goes Bimblebox?) and huge global effects through increased CO2 output.
>  
> Denise uses the word "waste" - whereas a more accurate term is dredge spoil.
> Interestingly in the US, dredge spoil islands from the intra coastal ship
> canal are an important site for breeding colonial waterbirds. One person's
> rubbish is another person's treasure. Having visited one or two of these in
> the breeding season, with their collection of terms, skimmers, herons, egrets,
> avocets etc they are not like a pile mine tailings or rubbish dump. As most of
> the coast there, like here, has a lot of human pressure, these spoil islands
> are now vital for local bird populations. They are not proposing to make
> islands out of this stuff in Queensland - but perhaps they could? They will
> need to keep the channel clear so regular replenishment is possible. I'm sure
> some terns, noddies and pelicans could appreciate it.
>  
> Mark Stanley
>  
>  
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 06:50:40 +0930
> From: Denise Goodfellow <>
> To: "" <>
> Subject: [Birding-Aus] Great Barrier Reef dumping
> Message-ID: <>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="US-ASCII"
> Good morning all from a very wet Darwin River
> 
> Are any members raising concerns about the decision to dump waste in the
> Great Barrier Reef Marine Park?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Denise Lawungkurr Goodfellow
> PO Box 71,  Darwin River,
> NT 0841
> 043 8650 835
> 
> PhD candidate, SCU
> Vice-chair, Wildlife Tourism Australia
> 


_______________________________________________
Birding-Aus mailing list

To change settings or unsubscribe visit:
http://birding-aus.org/mailman/listinfo/birding-aus_birding-aus.org

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU