Thanks Clive - that too! Thanks for the correction.
Cheers,
Stephen
-----Original Message-----
From:
On Behalf Of Clive Nealon
Sent: Wednesday, 30 October 2013 1:33 PM
To: ;
Subject: Birds and windfarms: a correction
...and while you're there, perhaps
'not as impartial company or consultancy reports'
is not quite what you meant.
If it were, then perhaps we don't have a problem.
Regards, Clive.
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Ambrose <>
To: 'birding-aus' <>
Sent: Wed, Oct 30, 2013 7:11 am
Subject: Birds and windfarms: a correction
> At the same time Dr Hull has been critical of the standard of some
consultancy reports that have assessed potential impacts of wind farms on
bird and bat populations because of their impartiality and lack of
scientific rigour.
My apologies, "impartiality" in the above sentence should have been
"partiality"!
Cheers,
Stephen
===============================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
http://birding-aus.org
===============================
===============================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
http://birding-aus.org
===============================
===============================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
http://birding-aus.org
===============================
|
