Kakapo "not worth saving"

[Glenn Ehmke <>]

I’m sure the media coverage doesn't do this research full justice, but I do 
wonder why we need a mathematics professor to tell us populations are at 
greater risk of getting to zero when their numbers are closer to zero?
Maybe this isn’t such ground-breaking research...
PS how do you think 16,000+ people have voted on the Wellington papers question 
“Should we abandon efforts to save the Kakapo?”
http://www.stuff.co.nz/environment/4879292/Let-wonderfully-weird-kakapo-die-scientist

--- On Thu, 14/4/11, Dave Torr <> wrote:

From: Dave Torr <>
Subject: [Birding-Aus] Kakapo "not worth saving"
To: "birding-aus" <>
Received: Thursday, 14 April, 2011, 4:45 PM

http://www.theage.com.au/environment/animals/kiwis-in-a-flap-after-scientist-proclaims-endangered-bird-is-not-worth-saving-20110414-1dfe2.html

ruffled a few feathers (not really intended as a pun!)
===============================

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 

http://birding-aus.org
===============================
===============================

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 

http://birding-aus.org
===============================