birding-aus

Urban silvereyes changing their tune

To: "Philip Veerman" <>
Subject: Urban silvereyes changing their tune
From: Carl Clifford <>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 11:25:40 +1100
Reading the paper and the diagrams, I would say that the meaning of frequency is purely Hertzian.

Cheers,

Carl Clifford


On 06/01/2011, at 11:15 AM, Philip Veerman wrote:

Sort of sounds interesting. Do others see an unfortunate possible
ambiguity here? In that "frequency" has two meanings of relevance. In
this case by context it appears to mean how often something occurs in
time, not the sound frequency, as in what we hear as pitch. But then
again maybe it is both, in the same way that playing a tape faster
raises the pitch...........

Philip

-----Original Message-----
From: 
 On Behalf Of Laurie Knight
Sent: Thursday, 6 January 2011 10:25 AM
Cc: Birding Aus
Subject: Urban silvereyes changing their tune


Actually, the article is freely available at
http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2011/01/05/rspb.201
0.2296.full

On 06/01/2011, at 9:19 AM, Laurie Knight wrote:

The abstract for the paper referred to in

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/urban-songbirds-change-their-tune-2011
0105-19g94.html
is as follows



Geographically pervasive effects of urban noise on frequency and
syllable rate of songs and calls in silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis)

Dominique A. Potvin, Kirsten M. Parris and Raoul A. Mulder

Published online before print

Proc. R. Soc. B January 5, 2011, doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2296


Abstract

Recent studies in the Northern Hemisphere have shown that songbirds
living in noisy urban environments sing at higher frequencies than
their rural counterparts. However, several aspects of this
phenomenon remain poorly understood. These include the geographical
scale over which such patterns occur (most studies have compared
local populations), and whether they involve phenotypic plasticity
or microevolutionary change. We conducted a field study of silvereye
(Zosterops lateralis) vocalizations over more than 1 million km2 of
urban and rural south-eastern Australia, and compared possible
effects of urban noise on songs (which are learned) and contact
calls (which are innate). Across 14 paired urban and rural
populations, silvereyes consistently sang both songs and contact
calls at higher frequencies in urban environments. Syllable rate
(syllables per second) decreased in urban environments, consistent
with the hypothesis that reflective structures degrade song and
encourage longer intervals between syllables. This comprehensive
study is, to our knowledge, the first to demonstrate varied
adaptations of urban bird vocalizations over a vast geographical
area, and to provide insight into the mechanism responsible for
these changes.
===============================

===============================

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 

http://birding-aus.org
===============================

===============================

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message: unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 

http://birding-aus.org
===============================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU