|Subject:||Re: Black-chinned Honeyeaters|
|From:||Murray Lord <>|
|Date:||Wed, 03 Nov 2010 12:17:26 +0800|
I mentioned this in my original post on this topic a few months ago - see http://bioacoustics.cse.unsw.edu.au/birding-aus/2010-07/msg00060.html
I have the paper at home and will double check, but my recollection is that it concluded (1) Black chinned and Golden backed are each other's closest relative (so it's a different situation compared to what they found with the White naped) and (2) that the genetic differences between those two forms are less than between the other forms recognised as 'good' species.
So while you might still be able to argue they should be split it would have to be on the basis of the genetic data combined with other factors - the genetic data does not really present a compelling case on its own.
=============================== To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message: unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line) to: http://birding-aus.org ===============================
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Varied and Mangrove Honeyeaters, Tony Keene|
|Next by Date:||Bustard - Power lines 'invisible' to some birds, Laurie Knight|
|Previous by Thread:||Black-chinned Honeyeaters, jnsneddon|
|Next by Thread:||Black-chinned Honeyeaters, Cas and Lisa Liber|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: firstname.lastname@example.org.EDU.AU