birding-aus

RE: Decimal Vs Sexagesimal Notation

To: "'Bob Green'" <>, "'Birding Aus'" <>
Subject: RE: Decimal Vs Sexagesimal Notation
From: "Tony Russell" <>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 09:11:27 +0930
Certainly, but who wants to have to do that all the time ?  And let's face
it, a normal DMS ( WGS84) system seems to prove complex enough for some of
our , let's say more senior , birding fraternity without the added procedure
of multiplying each decimal step by 60 to get back to DMS which people
understand and can relate to on their hard copy topo maps.

Tony


-----Original Message-----
From: 
 On Behalf Of Bob Green
Sent: Tuesday, 11 May 2010 8:06 PM
To: Birding Aus
Subject: RE: Decimal Vs Sexagesimal Notation

Hi Geoff
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't a conversion from decimal degrees to true
degrees as simple as multiplying the decimal figure by 60?
eg 141.5 deg becomes 141 deg (.5X60=30) so 30 minutes and this of course
carries on into the seconds as well.

Bob Green
==========www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
==========


===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
===============================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU