Geez, they might even be able to bring back my old mum !
Tony
-----Original Message-----
From:
On Behalf Of
Sent: Wednesday, 10 March 2010 3:02 PM
To: Colin Trainor
Cc:
Subject: Scientists tease DNA from eggshell of extinct
birds
If they bring back the Moa they'll have to bring back Haast's Eagle to
control it! : D Watch out kiwi's!
"Colin Trainor" <>
Sent by:
10/03/2010 03:27 PM
To
<>
cc
Subject
[Birding-Aus] Scientists tease DNA from eggshell of extinct birds
Scientists tease DNA from eggshell of extinct birds
* By Richard Ingham in Paris
* From: AFP
* March 10, 2010 1:22PM
IN a world first, scientists in Australia announced today they had
extracted DNA from the fossilised eggshells of extinct birds, including
iconic giants such as the moa and elephant bird.
The achievement marks a major step towards drafting the genome of birds
wiped out by human greed, although the scientists warn this does not mean
an extinct species should -- or even can -- be resurrected in the style of
Hollywood movie hit Jurassic Park.
The team, led by Michael Bunce of Murdoch University in Perth, Western
Australia, say they isolated DNA from desiccated inner membranes in fossil
eggshells, found in 13 locations in Australia, Madagascar and New Zealand.
Ancient genetic material was coaxed from the eggshell of the moa
(Dinornis), a flightless cousin to the ostrich that reached up to four
metres (13 feet) in height and was hunted to extinction by New Zealand's
Maori by the late 18th century.
DNA was also extracted from the elephant bird (Aepyornis), like the moa
and ostrich a species of ratite, said the study, published in the
Proceedings of the Royal Society B.
Growing up to three metres (10 feet) high, the bird was wiped out by
European colonisation of Madagascar by 1700.
Other successes were reported using eggshells from an Australian owl and a
New Zealand duck of unknown date. The oldest egg sample was from an emu
(Dromaius novaehollandiae), some 19,000 years old.
But the team were unable to get DNA from far older samples in Australia,
estimated at 50,000 years old, from an extinct megafaunal bird called
Genyornis.
The technique entails reducing the shell to powder, extracting the DNA
with lab chemicals and then amplifying it using polymerase chain reaction,
or PCR -- a standard tool used by forensic scientists, for instance, in
getting the famous "genetic fingerprint.''
Mr Bunce said the team extracted in each case only a tiny amount of DNA --
just 250 base pairs, the "rungs'' on the ladder-like genetic code, and
this is less than a fraction of one percent of the bird's genome.
"The point was proof of principle, to show that it can be done,'' he said
in a phone interview with AFP.
"We didn't go out to get very long pieces of DNA. That's obviously the
next step.''
Mr Bunce said the exploit would give palaeontologists a new window into
creatures of the past.
Until now, DNA has been teased from bones -- for instance, providing most
of the genome of the Neanderthal, our enigmatic extinct cousins -- and
also from preserved hair.
Eggshells, overlooked as potential source material, turn out to be
astonishingly robust at protecting DNA.
They are a tough biomineral matrix of calcium carbonate and are less prone
than bones to infiltration by bacteria, which contaminates samples.
And they are also plentiful. Archaeological sites have yielded harvests of
eggs plundered from nests by early humans, eager to keep a store of
protein at hand.
It could be possible to go back further than fossilised eggs that are
older than 19,000 years, if the shells come from a permanently cold
environment, the scientists hope. But eggs that are completely
"mineralised'' -- in other words, like rock -- over hundreds of thousands
of years are not a likely option.
Could the moa, the elephant bird or the dodo, which was hunted to oblivion
for food and hat feathers, ever walk again?
"We can reassemble the genome to get an idea of what an extinct species
looked like. But (resurrecting it) is still in the realm of science
fiction. It's completely hypothetical, and frankly not a debate I really
want to have,'' said Mr Bunce.
So far, scientists have only been able to synthesise a tiny strand of DNA,
creating around 200 artificial base pairs, he said. The human genome, by
comparison, amounts to around three billion base pairs.
"Some researchers have inserted certain genes into living species... (but)
this does not bring an extinct species to life,'' co-researcher Charlotte
Oskam pointed out.
"We think, like the mammoth, that it will be possible to do extinct
genomes using fossil eggshell but it is a huge leap to imagining we can
clone an extinct species. Personally I think it is unethical to recreate a
species that is extinct.''
==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
==============================
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
===============================
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
===============================
|
