birding-aus

Duck Hunting

To: <>
Subject: Duck Hunting
From: Fiona Anderson <>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:58:12 +1100
Hi Paul,



Thanks for all your efforts in such a good cause.  I wrote to DSE expressing my 
disgust at the way the government had gone wishy washy over this (strong gun 
lobby behind it, I suspect) but I only got a "we thank and take note of your 
thoughts" sort of reply.  But I do feel that the more people who express their 
opposition to this the more notice the government will take.  I am 
unfortunately too old to do anything physical like you but will continue to 
press them by email.



Thanks,



Fiona


> From: 
> To: ; ; 
> Subject: RE: [Birding-Aus] Duck Hunting
> Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:57:15 +1100
>
> Peter,
>
> First of all, I agree that there is a distinction between the increased 
> disturbance of threatened species due to the drought because of shooting, and 
> the innate cruelty of shooting in general. For me, and I suspect the majority 
> of anti-duck protesters, the fundamental issue that we are fighting against 
> is the cruelty. In many respects it is the drought and low bird numbers that 
> will hopefully result in the cessation of this activity. All the advice given 
> to the government this year said exactly that. The government chose to ignore 
> this advice.
>
> Duck hunting IS more cruel than fox and rabbit shooting, and certainly IS 
> more cruel than the slaughtering of sheep and cattle for meat. Whilst I 
> appreciate that many people are vegetarian because of their opposition to the 
> slaughter of animals, I do believe that this slaughter is conducted in as 
> humane a way as possible.
>
> Duck hunting is regarded as a sport. These creatures are not killed for food, 
> nor because they are vermin. They are killed for the fun of it. The sheer joy 
> of pointing a firearm at a living creature and pulling the trigger. Whilst 
> there are "bag limits" imposed on shooters, they will continue to kill and 
> wound waterfowl for the fun of it, without collecting the animals they have 
> shot, so they don't exceed their bag counts. Shooters will also ignore 
> wounded birds, because they are just too difficult to retrieve. It is much 
> easier to simply shoot another one. These wounded birds will often die in 
> agony with horrific wounds. Even if they don't die as a result of the shot, 
> they will be taken by predators.
>
> Duck hunting is called "Recreational Shooting". Not even Field and Game 
> Australia, Inc tries to hide the fact that this is done for fun. For no other 
> reason.
>
> Paul
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Shute 
> Sent: Sunday, 22 March 2009 11:02 PM
> To: ; ; 
> 
> Subject: Re: [Birding-Aus] Duck Hunting
>
> I'm more concerned about the shooting and even the disturbance of species 
> that are threatened or in low numbers because of the drought. The two issues 
> (that and the cruelty) seem to become easily confused.
>
> It's cruel, but no more than fox or rabbit shooting, or even slaughtering 
> sheep and cattle for meat.
>
> Peter Shute
>
>
> --------------------------
> Sent using BlackBerry
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU