birding-aus

Hooded Plover

To: <>, <>
Subject: Hooded Plover
From: "Tim Dolby" <>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:24:37 +1100
Hi Louise,

The 'poor' fencing is actually deliberately none-evasive. After much research, 
done here and in NZ with New Zealand Dotterel Tuturiwhatu Pukunui (Charadrius 
obscurus), it seems the most effective conservation technique for Hooded Plover 
is simply fencing. It allows the birds to move freely, but importantly it 
negates a negative view of the nests from the local community and beach-goers 
who object to more strident fencing and signage. It also seems that simple 
fences does (on the whole) make people act more responsibly and does get 
community support.

Strong fencing on the other hand, apart from being awkward for the birds 
(plovers do not like nesting next to signs and fences and people move closer to 
the nest to read the signage), increases the level of vandalism - with 
destruction of fences, signage and eggs. Effectively community support is lost. 
Electric fencing would last 5 minutes ? think of the reaction of parents re 
kids on the beach.

The conservation of the Hooded Plover is as much an issue of ethno-ornithology 
(the study of the relationship between people and birds) as it is simply 
conservation. The issue has attracted much debate, often heated, but is always 
interesting, illuminating many of the multi-faceted issues relating to bird 
conservation.

Cheers,

Tim Dolby

-----Original Message-----
From:  on behalf of 
Sent: Tue 13/01/2009 08:23
To: 
Subject: Hooded Plover


Dear Mr Jarman
I was delighted to read your email to birding news.
We are staying near Ulladulla beach where there is a (poorly) fenced area to 
protect the hooded plovers nest.
By sheer chance we were on the beach when an exuberant staffordshire terrier 
nounded up to the two hooded plovers who were trotting along the beach 
together. We distracted and diverted him. Tried to find the owners however 
people said "he is a local dog who just visits the beach at will". We were/are 
all most concerned about this situation. The staffy finally bounded off with 
other beach walkers but can you believe that no less than 3! other dogs arried 
in the short space of some 30 minutes or so to the each. They all! investigated 
the nesting area.
I believe that far firmer measures are required. e.g. stronger signage, some 
implemented punitive measures to the owners of these dogs and a better fenced 
area. ? is electric feasible?
Appreciate your thoughts. I am sending copies of this email to the relevant 
department.
I phoned 44548500 and got a message. Later in the day saw the ranger at Lake 
Conjola however he smiled shrugged and said "It happens all the time". So the 
current protection of this area is far from satisfactory. To the point where it 
basically may as well not be there.
Louise Howland
182 High Street
Kangaroo Flat 3555
Tel 0428551161

PS My cousin too some fabulous photos of the pair.
PSS We have now seen a similar situation at Lake Conjola


==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
=============================
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU