birding-aus

Long-held Assumptions Of Flightless Bird Evolution Challenged By New Res

To: "John Leonard" <>
Subject: Long-held Assumptions Of Flightless Bird Evolution Challenged By New Research
From: "Chris Sanderson" <>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 01:04:45 +1000
Well we know flight evolved three separate times - pteradactyls, birds and
bats, so why not the reverse?

Regards,
Chris

On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:57 PM, John Leonard <>wrote:

> There's always a temptation for people to invoke Occam's Razor and
> decide that the simplest explanation is what happened (here, that
> flightlessness evolved once in the common ancestor). However, time is
> very long and we have limited knowledge of the different speciation
> events that took place. So, it appears, the simplest explanation is
> not the case!
>
> John Leonard
>
> 2008/9/8 Andrew Taylor <>:
> >  "Large flightless birds of the southern continents - African ostriches,
> >  Australian emus and cassowaries, South American rheas and the New
> Zealand
> >  kiwi - do not share a common flightless ancestor as once believed."
> >
> > More at:
> > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/09/080903172152.htm
> >
> > The PNAS paper is here (abstract appended):
> >
> http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2008/09/02/0803242105.abstract?sid=bac941fc-cf09-4fe2-8e2b-18a15bcb3a97
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> >
> > Phylogenomic evidence for multiple losses of flight in ratite birds
> > Harshman et al.
> >
> > Ratites (ostriches, emus, rheas, cassowaries, and kiwis) are large,
> > flightless birds that have long fascinated biologists. Their current
> > distribution on isolated southern land masses is believed to reflect the
> > breakup of the paleocontinent of Gondwana. The prevailing view is that
> > ratites are monophyletic, with the flighted tinamous as their sister
> > group, suggesting a single loss of flight in the common ancestry of
> > ratites. However, phylogenetic analyses of 20 unlinked nuclear genes
> > reveal a genome-wide signal that unequivocally places tinamous within
> > ratites, making ratites polyphyletic and suggesting multiple losses of
> > flight. Phenomena that can mislead phylogenetic analyses, including long
> > branch attraction, base compositional bias, discordance between gene
> trees
> > and species trees, and sequence alignment errors, have been eliminated
> > as explanations for this result. The most plausible hypothesis requires
> > at least three losses of flight and explains the many morphological
> > and behavioral similarities among ratites by parallel or convergent
> > evolution. Finally, this phylogeny demands fundamental reconsideration
> > of proposals that relate ratite evolution to continental drift.
> >
> > ===============================
> > www.birding-aus.org
> > birding-aus.blogspot.com
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> > send the message:
> > unsubscribe
> > (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> > to: 
> > ===============================
> >
>
>
>
> --
> John Leonard
> Canberra
> Australia
> www.jleonard.net
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: 
> ===============================
>
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
===============================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU