Hi Alistair,
I had the same thoughts. You would think given they only seemed to need DNA
for confirmation they could have taken bloods or even clipped a couple of
feathers. This collectors mentality that a museum collection needs to be
"complete" was already the downfall of the Great Auk, it would be a shame if
another, poorly known species were to fall the same way.
Regards,
Chris
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Alastair Smith <>wrote:
> Brand new species, unknown to science and yet they 'collected' several
> specimens? Why is this day and age do we need to collect specimens?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> On Behalf Of Terry Bishop
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 August 2008 12:20 PM
> To: Birding Australia
> Subject: [Birding-Aus] New bird species discovered in Africa
>
>
> The newly found olive-backed forest robin (Stiphrornis pyrrholaemus)
>
> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/08/080815130415.htm
>
>
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to:
> ===============================
>
>
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to:
> ===============================
>
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
===============================
|