birding-aus
|
To: | Roger Giller <> |
---|---|
Subject: | Great vs Intermediate Egret |
From: | peter crow <> |
Date: | Wed, 21 May 2008 14:00:34 +1000 |
Maybe that's why I prefer NOT to use Simpson and Day. Peter On 21/05/2008, at 10:36 AM, Roger Giller wrote: Peter,My field guide, Simpson and Day 7th edition, makes no mention of the gape as a distinguishing feature. They refer mainly to the "flatter' forehead of the Great vs. Intermediate, the longer neck to body ratio, and the relatively longer, more slender bill of the Great.Regards. Roger |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Partners, Jill Dening |
---|---|
Next by Date: | rant against twitching, Peter Waanders |
Previous by Thread: | Great vs Intermediate Egret, Dave Torr |
Next by Thread: | Great vs Intermediate Egret, Peter Shute |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU