birding-aus

Cooktown Slaty-backed Gull happily post sitting today

To: BIRDING-AUS <>
Subject: Cooktown Slaty-backed Gull happily post sitting today
From: L&L Knight <>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 17:34:26 +1000
Mike, when you say short primary projection, have you ruled out feather wear? That is, the primaries appear to be full length and do not appear to be short because they are worn down? [I don't have the pictures in front of me, so ask simply for completeness]

Regards, Laurie.

On 23/02/2008, at 5:08 PM, Mike Carter wrote:

Nikolas Haass <> said today
To: "Tony Russell" <>; "Mike Carter" < >; "BIRDING-AUS" <>


Although I was the first one who dared to ID the bird as a female first-winter Slaty-backed Gull (see old posting below), I still would NOT say that we 'SETTLED' on a definite ID. We clearly ruled out Thayer's Gull, American Herring Gull (see below), the fuscus complex including Heuglin's Gull (heuglini and taimyrensis), Eurasian Herring Gull, and most of the "yellow-legged gull complex". Moreover, as I indicated a week ago, tail and primary patterns speak against Mongolian and Steppe Gull. And also Vega doesn't fit 100%. But - although it was my favorite - does Slaty-back fit 100%? No, it looks good for a Slaty-back, but apparently not 100%! Look at all the divergent comments from experts from all over the world! I think, the final ID at this point should be "possible Slaty-back".

Nikolas

So although you named it several days ago, you are still not 100% convinced?
Please tell us what you consider unsatisfactory in that ID.

Jeff Davies and I will prepare the BARC submission and we are confident that we can totally justify that diagnosis. Among significant aspects that you didn't address were the plain dark underwing pattern and short primary projection beyond tail. Once those two features fell into place for Slaty-backed ruling out Vega Gull the one remaining stumbling block was the scapular pattern which was more typical of Vega Gull. But now we know some Slaty- backs can be similarly patterned there are no contra-indications. The presence of that second generation secondary feather noted by Alvaro was a bonus. All discriminators are in favour of Slaty-backed Gull. QED.

Mike Carter
30 Canadian Bay Road
Mount Eliza  VIC 3930
Tel  (03) 9787 7136

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message:
unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
===============================

===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message: unsubscribe (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
===============================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU