But at least they look like shorebirds should. I have no argument with
them being included, if that's what the DNA says, only that it seems odd
to the uninitiated (me) to include them. I would have expected a tiny
explanation about why they included it.
Hopefully the information about them in the book will be useful to me
one day. All I have to do is remember that it's in the shorebird book -
not a place I would have expected to find it.
Peter Shute
wrote on Thursday, 17 January 2008
11:14 AM:
> I suspect that Banded Lapwing and Inland Dotterel would agree as well!
>
> On 17/01/2008, L&L Knight <> wrote:
>>
>> Well, what I mean is that being "lumped" with shorebirds is somewhat
>> different to "belongs" in the shorebirds group. I don't think that
>> Plains Wanderers would view themselves as shorebirds, if it were
>> possible to ask their opinion.
==============================www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
send the message:
unsubscribe
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to:
=============================
|
