birding-aus

Question on Grey-headed Whistler Pachycephalagriseiceps taxonomy

To:
Subject: Question on Grey-headed Whistler Pachycephalagriseiceps taxonomy
From: "Dave Sargeant" <>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 07:45:22 +0400
 I wish it were that easy. Unfortunately it's not quite this simple. If this
split had of happened as might have been expected (moving simplex out of the
lumped species) then the IOC checklist would give the range of simplex as
Aus to New Guinea. Unfortunately it doesn't - it gives the range of simplex
as NE Aus only.

So what happened in the IOC checklist to the remainder of this previously
lumped species? It appears to have fallen off. Looking at the ranges of
other Whistlers, none of them appear to have grisieceps absorbed into them.
Confusing.

dave
On 03/09/07, Paul Van Gasse <> wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Quite simple, really. If P. simplex is split, it becomes monotypic, all
> the
> other subspecies coming under griseiceps - including NE Australian
> peninsulae. Thus, Australia gains a species, both P. simplex and P.
> griseiceps occurring there.
>
> Yet, Clements did make a mistake, as P. simplex (sensu stricto) only
> occurs
> in N Australia (Northern Territory), not in the NE.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Paul Van Gasse
> Kruibeke, Belgium
> 
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: 
>  Namens Dave Sargeant
> Verzonden: zondag 2 september 2007 19:34
> Aan: 
> Onderwerp: [Birding-Aus] Question on Grey-headed Whistler
> Pachycephalagriseiceps taxonomy
>
> I've been comparing the latest Clements v6 to the IOC checklist.
> I've encountered a few difficulties with the bird listed by Clements
> as "Grey-headed Whistler *Pachycephala griseiceps*". This species does not
> appear listed in the IOC checklist. Clements gives the range as New Guinea
> to NE Australia.
>
> To complicate things both IOC and Clements list Grey Whislter *P.
> simplex*as occurring in NE Australia. Therefore Clements implies that
> *griseiceps* and *simplex* both occur, whereas IOC list only one species.
>
> Digging through old references, *griseiceps* was formerly a subspecies of
> *
> simplex* with a range of NE New Guinea only.
>
> The form* griseiceps* does not get a mention in my Pizzy and Knight Aussie
> fieldguide, so on the surface the listing in Clemets appears to be an
> error.
> However there's probably more to this than meets the eye. Is *griseiceps*
> a
> synonyn of somthing else? Looking at the number of species of
> *Pachycephala*Whistler Clements lists for Australia mainland it comes
> to 9, whereas the
> fieldguide has only 8.
>
> Any one shed any light on this?
>
> Thanks
> dave
> --
> Dave Sargeant
> Muscat
> Oman
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: 
> ===============================
>
> ===============================
> www.birding-aus.org
> birding-aus.blogspot.com
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> send the message:
> unsubscribe
> (in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
> to: 
> ===============================
>



-- 
Dave Sargeant
Muscat
Oman
===============================
www.birding-aus.org
birding-aus.blogspot.com

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, 
send the message:
unsubscribe 
(in the body of the message, with no Subject line)
to: 
===============================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU