birding-aus

The shortcomings of field guides - [more grist for the field guide revie

To: Birding Aus <>
Subject: The shortcomings of field guides - [more grist for the field guide review mill]
From: knightl <>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:03:51 +1000
On yesterday's Southport pelagic, I got a couple of photographs of pterodromas (petrels) that illustrate the dangers of using the commercially available field guides. That the birds were pterodromas was obvious with their white chins - the question for me was whether they were the regular providence petrels or [I think the locally less common] kermadec or herald petrels.

The point was that the birds clearly had pale bellies [off white with brown flecks]. Indeed, one bird very closely matched the drawing on p 59 of Pizzey and Knight (1997 ed) of an intermediate morph herald petrel.

Neither Pizzey & Knight, Simpson & Day nor Morecombe mention the possibility of providence petrels having a pale belly. The good old reader's digest "complete book of australian birds" on the other hand notes that "In flight at sea the Providence Petrel looks generally brown toned. Its head is clearly dark and in favourable lighting conditions contrasts strongly with the paler, almost buff tones of its underparts".

While getting the general shape right, Pizzey & Knight only show the underbody of providence petrels as dark chocolate brown. Morecombe describes the underparts as "slaty grey-brown" and compares providence petrels to dark morph kermadec and herald petrels. Simpson & Day has virtually no description, but at least describes the body as grey, and if you [can find and ] look closely at the half-matchbox sized drawings, it does show some of the colour transitions in the right places.

What I would like to know is why, in the case of Pizzey & Knight, which at least has the most commentary and the most life-like drawings, and which devotes whole pages to both the wandering and shy albatrosses, can't put in a single line mentioning that providence petrels can appear with pale bellies totally at variance with their main drawing.

Given that the "brown petrels" are pretty hard to ID from rocking boats, it would be most helpful if the field guides could include include a bit more detail on how the birds look in flight over sea. [Something to keep in mind for your next review of field guides Lawrie C].

Regards,  Laurie.

--------------------------------------------
Birding-Aus is now on the Web at
www.birding-aus.org
--------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message 'unsubscribe
birding-aus' (no quotes, no Subject line)
to 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • The shortcomings of field guides - [more grist for the field guide review mill], knightl <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU