| 
 1. Day length is probably the main aspect. At
high latitudes, winter day length is very short, not to mention the cold and low
food supply, so it makes sense to follow the summer. 
  
2. Yes that is the only explanation I have ever heard for it
and it appears to be as good or better an explanation as anything else. Since
then the word Rosella has been used for that group of broadtail parrots that
really are all fairly similar and share certain plumage features (most obviously
the cheek patch of different colour and scalloped backs). 
  
Philip 
    -----Original Message----- From:
    Dr Richard Nowotny <> To:
    Messages Birding-aus <> Date:
    Sunday, 24 August 2003 22:26 Subject: [BIRDING-AUS] 1. Bird
    Migration 2. "Rosella"
 
  Two
    questions:
  1. A semi-birding friend who went with us to see
    Travelling Birds asked me  why birds migrate such long, and dangerous,
    distances when they seem to  have quite suitable habitat for their needs
    (including nesting?) in their  wintering grounds.  I started 
    proffering responses gathered from my reading  over the years, but found
    it more difficult than I expected justifying say  a Red-necked Stint
    flying from what seems to be relatively food-rich  mud-flats (and 
    associated coastal habitat) in south-eastern Australia to  somewhere in
    northern Asia to breed, and then to endure the equally long  and
    hazardous return flight for the non-breeding season. What are the 
    scientific reasons/theories for these complex and frequently  very long
    migration patterns, ie what are the present (or past - assuming  that it
    is now genetically-acquired behaviour, which may not any longer  actually
    be necessary) survival advantages of making such a flight, over  the
    obvious disadvantages.  Does it date back to a previous age when the
     advantages were more apparent, or are the present advantages of
    migration  still so great that the behaviour continues to be truly
    necessary?
  2. A much more prosaic matter:  Is it correct that
    the name "rosellas" is a  corruption of "Rose
    Hillers" after the early Botany Bay locale, and  present-day Sydney
    suburb, of Rose Hill where they were commonly seen by  early naturalists
    and travellers between Sydney Cove and (?)  Parramatta?  If not,
    what is the correct origin of the name?
  Richard Nowotny
    
  Birding-Aus is on the Web at www.shc.melb.catholic.edu.au/home/birding/index.html To
    unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message "unsubscribe
    birding-aus" (no quotes, no Subject line) to 
 
  
 |