birding-aus

birds, the environment and Longneck Lagoon

To: "Brian Everingham" <>
Subject: birds, the environment and Longneck Lagoon
From: Frank O'Connor <>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:04:50 +0800
At 18:00 21/02/2001 +1100, Brian Everingham wrote:
You might remember the series of emails regarding the salvinia infestation
at Longneck Lagoon some time back. I wrote as Secretary of the National
Parks Association to the Director, Central NPWS, Bob Conroy making some
inquiries and he has now replied.

In his response he states that:
1. The NPWS has commenced management of this weed and is presently
finalising a Review of Environmental Factors document. This must consider
the requirements of the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity
Conservation Act, 1999.
2. The presence of the weed and the proposed control methodology have both
support and opposition from within the community.
3. The long term impact of the use of herbicide in the Lagoon in particular
has to be properly assessed.
4. The eradication of salvinia in this waterbody is not expected to be easy.
5. The proposed methodology involves mechanical harvesting to reduce the wed
biomass followed by the application of a specific (unstated) herbicide to
the remaining weed. There will then follow an intensive monitoring
commitment and "spot" action against any remaining weed presence.
6. The control of the weed within the catchment is also being pursued by the
NPWS.

Brian,

I was recently in Kenya. In an airline magazine they had an article about the successful eradication of an aquatic weed on Lake Victoria that had covered very large areas and was bad enough to shut down villages as ferries and fishermen could no longer operate. I think from memory that the weed was salvinia that had been released accidentally on a river in Uganda and been spread down river to the lake. They had planned to use mechanical means (but did not have the money) and / or herbicide (but were very worried about the affect on other organisms). Both these methods would only have controlled it temporarily and would need to be reapplied every few years or so.

Their solution was from Australia through the release of a beetle which had been used in Australia to control the weed. I think that they received the help from the CSIRO. This solution was permanent as small amounts of the weed persisted and continued to host the beetle which prevented any further major outbreaks. Have the NPWS tried any form of biological control?

________________________________________________________________
Frank O'Connor      Birding WA http://www.iinet.net.au/~foconnor
8C Hardy Road                      Email : 
Nedlands  WA  6009                                ICQ : 14655047
Phone : +61 8 9386 5694

Birding-Aus is on the Web at
www.shc.melb.catholic.edu.au/home/birding/index.html
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send the message
"unsubscribe birding-aus" (no quotes, no Subject line)
to 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU