|Subject:||Re: Parrot distributions|
|From:||"Karen Bayly" <>|
|Date:||Fri, 9 Oct 1998 14:03:57 GMT+1000|
On Fri, 9 Oct 1998, wrote:|
> It's clear that the ranges of lots of species are not static, and that
> human-induced changes to habitats will influence changes to bird
> distributions, as well as more direct causes such as escaping captive birds
> and deliberate introductions. What is not so clear is how fluid those
> distributions are, were or would be in the absence of human interference.
> However, given the highly variable climate across much of Australia (in the
> longer term as well as seasonally), the high proportion of nomadic species
> in our overall bird population and the fragmented ranges of many species/
> "superspecies", "natural" range fluctuations might have been an important
> part of the ecological picture. Maybe we sometimes take for granted a
> greater degree of ecological stability in pre-European times than was
> really the case?
I've also wondered about this. I've often heard people comment that Sulphur-crested Cockatoos and Rainbow Lorikeets have increased in the Sydney region. However, I have been reading the journals of James Cook, Joseph Banks, Arthur Phillip, and various other earlier settlers or visitors (including Charles Darwin), and these birds appear to have been quite common in the late 1700's and early 1800's. It is possible that they had decreased in numbers over the past 150 years and now are building up to previous levels (although proving this in the scientific meaning of the word would be difficult).
In general we tend to look at changes in population distributions of native birds over very short time periods - often less than 100 years - in which the effects of previous or current human interference may still be strong. Such time periods may be too short to reflect the real population dynamics of a given population, particularly long-lived species, and rarely adequately reflect the effects of variables such as climate fluctuations. We so often have no reliable baseline data against which we can compare distribution changes. At best, we may find some information in historical documents and through Aboriginal knowledge, though often we have access to neither.
As Jack Krohn noted, some species obviously have benefited from human-induced changes to habitat etc. to the exclusion of other species. However, our lack of knowledge about pre- and early-European Australian species distribution raises some issues about how we judge what birds (or any other animal or plant) should be in what region and in what abundance, especially when we are considering either culling or reintroduction programs.
While I have no solutions as to how we can get better baseline data, a greater awareness of how little information we have on which to base many of our conservation decisions, may go a long way to helping us make wiser choices.
*************************************************** Karen L. Bayly Ecology Lab School of Biological Sciences MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY NSW 2109 Phone: 61 2 9850-8191 or 61 2 9850-9441 Fax: 61 2 9850-8245 Email: OR
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Bird Week Activities, Andrew Patrick|
|Next by Date:||Vic. twitchathon, RAOU Handbook|
|Previous by Thread:||Parrot distributions, jack . krohn|
|Next by Thread:||Ibis in Brisbane CBD, Syd Curtis|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the birding-aus mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: firstname.lastname@example.org.EDU.AU