To: | <> |
---|---|
Subject: | New Bioacoustics article in PLOS ONE |
From: | "Corcoran, Aaron" <> |
Date: | Mon, 6 May 2013 17:01:11 -0700 |
Dear Colleagues,
You may find this recently published bioacoustics article of interest. More information on this subject can also be found at this website: www.sonarjamming.com Optimal Predator Risk Assessment by the Sonar-Jamming Arctiine Moth Bertholdia trigona Abstract. Nearly all animals face a tradeoff between seeking food and mates and avoiding predation. Optimal escape theory holds that an animal confronted with a predator should only flee when benefits of flight (increased survival) outweigh the costs (energetic costs, lost foraging time, etc.). We propose a model for prey risk assessment based on the predator's stage of attack. Risk level should increase rapidly from when the predator detects the prey to when it commits to the attack. We tested this hypothesis using a predator =96 the echolocating bat =96 whose active biosonar reveals its stage of attack. We used a prey defense =96 clicking used for sonar jamming by the tiger moth *Bertholdia trigona*=96 that can b= e readily studied in the field and laboratory and is enacted simultaneously with evasive flight. We predicted that prey employ defenses soon after being detected and targeted, and that prey defensive thresholds discriminate between legitimate predatory threats and false threats where a nearby prey is attacked. Laboratory and field experiments using playbacks of ultrasound signals and naturally behaving bats, respectively, confirmed our predictions. Moths clicked soon after bats detected and targeted them. Also, *B. trigona* clicking thresholds closely matched predicted optimal thresholds for discriminating legitimate and false predator threats for bats using search and approach phase echolocation =96 the period when bats are searching for and assessing prey. To our knowledge, this is the first quantitative study to correlate the sensory stimuli that trigger defensive behaviors with measurements of signals provided by predators during natural attacks in the field. We propose theoretical models for explaining prey risk assessment depending on the availability of cues that reveal a predator's stage of attack. ***************************************************************** Aaron J. Corcoran, Ph.D. Department of Biology Wake Forest University www.sonarjamming.com ***************************************************************** |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Bioacoustic-monitoring] ext. deadlines 'Machine Learning meets Bioacoustics' @ ICML13, Herve Glotin |
---|---|
Next by Date: | bioacoustics articles: JASA 133(5), May 2013, Dave Mellinger |
Previous by Thread: | [Bioacoustic-monitoring] ext. deadlines 'Machine Learning meets Bioacoustics' @ ICML13, Herve Glotin |
Next by Thread: | bioacoustics articles: JASA 133(5), May 2013, Dave Mellinger |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Bioacoustics-L mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU