bioacoustics-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Bioacoustic papers in Behaviour 147 (April 2010)

To: <>
Subject: Bioacoustic papers in Behaviour 147 (April 2010)
From: "Frank Veit" <>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:59:47 +0100
Bioacoustic papers in Behaviour 147 - April
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/brill/beh/2010/00000147/00000004

Abstracts below


Klenova, AV, IA Volodin, EV Volodina & KA Postelnykh (2010) Voice breaking in adolescent red-crowned cranes (Grus japonensis). Behaviour 147: 505-524.

Wilson, DR & CS Evans (2010) Female fowl (Gallus gallus) do not prefer alarm-calling males. Behaviour 147: 525-552.

-------

Abstracts:

Klenova, AV, IA Volodin, EV Volodina & KA Postelnykh (2010) Voice breaking in adolescent red-crowned cranes (Grus japonensis). Behaviour 147: 505-524.

Voice breaking is a process associated with puberty of human males that also occurs in adolescence in some birds. This study reports the jump-like vocal changes occurring during voice breaking in adolescent red-crowned cranes (Grus japonensis). We investigated acoustic parameters of chirp and trill calls during vocal ontogenesis from hatching to the age of 1.5 years in 17 male and 31 female captive red-crowned cranes and compared them with definitive calls of 5 male and 8 female conspecific adults. During voice breaking, trills and chirps of both sexes contained two non-overlapping independent fundamental frequencies: the upper one, representing the retained juvenile frequency, and the lower one, the newly attained adult frequency. Before voice breaking, the calls contained only the upper frequency, whereas after it only the lower one. Voice breaking occurred between the age of 7 and 11.5 months. We test whether sex, dates of birth and body mass gain are associated with voice breaking and speculate whether voice breaking triggers the disruption of the parent-chick bond or vice versa, or both events are driven by a third, yet unidentified trigger.


Wilson, DR & CS Evans (2010) Female fowl (Gallus gallus) do not prefer alarm-calling males. Behaviour 147: 525-552.

Phenotypic traits associated with reproductive outcomes are often thought to be under sexual selection. In fowl, Gallus gallus, the rate at which males produce anti-predator alarm calls is an excellent correlate of their mating and reproductive success. However, two different models can explain this relationship. Calling, like many costly traits, may be attractive to females. Alternatively, males that have recently mated may invest in their mates by increasing alarm call production. Although previous work provides strong support for the male investment hypothesis, the two hypotheses are not mutually exclusive. In this study, we tested the mate attraction hypothesis by manipulating male alarm calling rates in three separate mate choice experiments. The first experiment was conducted in a highly controlled laboratory setting. There, we used video playback techniques to present females with simulated males that differed only in their alarm calling responses to simulated predators. In the second experiment, females were presented with two live males in a naturalistic outdoor setting. One male's vocal output was supplemented with his own pre-recorded alarm calls, and the other male's was not. In the third experiment, we combined the realistic spatial scale of an outdoor context with the stringent experimental control offered by video playback. The male stimuli used in this experiment differed in their propensity to produce four intercorrelated vocal signals that are each correlated with male mating and reproductive success. These included aerial alarm calls, ground alarm calls, food calls, and crows. Results from the three experiments consistently showed that females do not prefer alarm-calling males, suggesting that male alarm calling is not a sexually selected signal.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Bioacoustic papers in Behaviour 147 (April 2010), Frank Veit <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Bioacoustics-L mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU