bioacoustics-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Marine Mammal Science articles

To:
Subject: Marine Mammal Science articles
From: Jason Gedamke <>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:53:46 -0700
Volume 19, Number 4
 October 2003
 
 TWO TYPES OF BLUE WHALE CALLS RECORDED IN THE GULF OF ALASKA. Kathleen M.
 Stafford, pages 682-693.
 
 At one time blue whales were found throughout the Gulf of Alaska, however,
 none have been sighted there in post-whaling era surveys. To determine if
 blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus) might now occur in the Gulf of Alaska,
 an array of hydrophones was deployed there in October 1999. Data were
 retrieved in May 2000 and in June 2001. Spectrograms from a random
 subsample comprising 15% of the 63,000 h of data were visually examined
 for blue whale calls. Call types attributed to both northeastern and
 northwestern Pacific blue whales were recorded. Both of these call types
 were recorded seasonally from the initial deployment date in October 1999
 through the third week of December 1999 and then from July 2000 through
 mid-December 2000. Both call types were regularly recorded on the same
 hydrophone at the same time indicating clear temporal and spatial overlap
 of the animals producing these calls. Two blue whale call types were
 recorded in the Gulf of Alaska suggesting that perhaps two stocks use this
 area. The northeastern call type has now been documented from the equator
 up to at least 55N in the eastern North Pacific.
 
 
 LOCALIZATION OF NORTH ATLANTIC RIGHT WHALE SOUNDS IN THE BAY OF FUNDY
 USING A SONOBUOY ARRAY. Marjo H. Laurinolli, Alex E. Hay, Francine
 Desharnais, and Christopher T. Taggart, pages 708-723.
 
 A free-drifting 14-sonobuoy array was used to localize North Atlantic
 right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) in the Grand Manan Basin area of the
 Bay of Fundy. This area is a primary summer/autumn right whale habitat and
 overlaps an international shipping lane. The three-hour deployment on a
 single day provided two-dimensional localization of 94 right whale sounds
 based on arrival time differences determined from spectrogram
 cross-correlation analysis. The sounds were of two distinct types: tonal
 and gunshot. Maximum detection distances were about 30 km for both types
 of sound. The mean RMS location error was 1.8 km for tonal-type sounds and
 2.5 km for gunshot-type sounds. The average RMS error was 20% of the
 average distance from the receiving hydrophones, the primary source of
 error being uncertainty in the sonobuoy positions.
 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Marine Mammal Science articles, Jason Gedamke <=
Admin

The University of NSW School of Computer and Engineering takes no responsibility for the contents of this archive. It is purely a compilation of material sent by many people to the Bioacoustics-L mailing list. It has not been checked for accuracy nor its content verified in any way. If you wish to get material removed from the archive or have other queries about the archive e-mail Andrew Taylor at this address: andrewt@cse.unsw.EDU.AU