Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Google

Results:

References: [ starter: 62 ] [ mic (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ]

Total 62 documents matching your query.

1. Re: "Starter" mic (score: 306)
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:33:19 -0600
It'll "work" but your mic is the most important component in the recording chain. The Rode NTG-2 shotgun is getting very high praise in some circles http://tinyurl.com/clp4f Its~ $200 more but should
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2005-12/msg00183.html (8,811 bytes)

2. "Starter" mic (score: 306)
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:47:54 +1000
Hi all, I'm looking for an inexpensive starter mic. Any thoughts. I've found an AudioTechnica ATR55 for $45 on Amazon. A directional mic with a "close" and "distant" switch. Freq. response 70-18,000H
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2005-12/msg00176.html (8,108 bytes)

3. recording very high frequency with standard mics (score: 19)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:50 +1000
Someone asked and I could not quickly find who because you people have been active the last week or so. How high will a standard mic go. Someone else with more experience than me would have to commen
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2007-03/msg00537.html (9,304 bytes)

4. Re: recording very high frequency with standard mics (score: 19)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:50 +1000
Have you tried a key jangling test the same way? I'd be curious to see a similar image from that, the traditional test used for mic pre distortion - care to do a comparison? Certinly safer than the s
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2007-03/msg00538.html (9,186 bytes)

5. Re: recording very high frequency with standard mics (score: 19)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:50 +1000
Yes keys do have ultrasonics too. It is such a complex signal that it leads to an easy ear check of a recording system. Too complex and long to give a good paper trail. The key compared to the spark
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2007-03/msg00539.html (10,381 bytes)

6. Re: recording very high frequency with standard mics (score: 19)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:50 +1000
Thanks Rich! Quick response. I see how it ia not so good visually compared to a listening test. Spark is more usable for this purpose - and easy to get! and gee, look at that HF hiss... Thanks, <L> L
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2007-03/msg00540.html (11,320 bytes)

7. Re: recording very high frequency with standard mics (score: 19)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:50 +1000
Hi Rich, thanks a lot for the hint!! I'll buy a sparker for my tests... I used keys, small bells, small hammers, old ultrasonic remote controls, generators connected to ultrasonic speakers... all the
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2007-03/msg00554.html (13,750 bytes)

8. Re: new member on a budget (score: 19)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:04 +1000
Hi Colin-- Great explanation concerning the higher gain requirements of nature recording and some of the drawbacks of built-in mics. Your story brings back memories of many hours spent trying to remo
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2008-12/msg00099.html (10,953 bytes)

9. Re: random equipment news (score: 19)
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 13:06:47 -0400
It might be possible, if the hill is big enough or by towing. And if the automatic transmission has a hydraulic pump on the output end. Takes a lot more speed to coast start a automatic even if it ca
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2004-05/msg00195.html (10,756 bytes)

10. Re: mics for parabola (score: 19)
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 01:52:52 -0400
Start with a few decisions: Stereo or Mono? What price range? What level of sound quality do you want? What exactly will you be recording? Is your emphasis on getting individual calls, or whole sound
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2004-04/msg00257.html (9,956 bytes)

11. Re: Sony PCM-M10 vs Zoom H4n best for outdoors / capturing frogs in (score: 10)
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:53:24 +1000
Rich, Overall, my advice is to get a starter budget system like the Sony and a mid range affordable mic. If you catch the recording bug, your next upgrade could be a low noise mixer which will get ov
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2012-02/msg00056.html (13,408 bytes)

12. Re: Sony PCM-M10 vs Zoom H4n best for outdoors / capturing frogs in (score: 10)
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:53:24 +1000
Thanks so much for all the new knowledge! This will prove a valuable refere= nce as I get deeper. One thing that seems important to master for now, esp when using the built-= in mics, is removing mic
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2012-02/msg00057.html (13,467 bytes)

13. Re: Help choosing low cost mic with Sony PCM-M10 (score: 10)
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:53:34 +1000
David, I'm just wondering how directional your Brinibox is (if at all).=0D =0D Peter Shute=0D =0D =0D --=0D Sent using BlackBerry=0D =0D ________________________________=0D From: m("yahoogroups.com",
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2012-01/msg00007.html (13,454 bytes)

14. Re: Help choosing low cost mic with Sony PCM-M10 (score: 10)
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:53:09 +1000
Arwen, I'm always prone to dishing out advice especially to newbies. :-) Yet again I'll say that the secret is to get the mic in the right place at the right time or you're on a non starter however
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2011-12/msg00169.html (11,369 bytes)

15. Re: [Nature Recordists] Help choosing low cost mic with Sony PCM-M= (score: 10)
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 16:45:36 +0000
10 Arwen, I'm always prone to dishing out advice especially to newbies. :-) Yet again I'll say that the secret is to get the mic in the right place at the right time or you're on a non starter howeve
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2011-12/msg00174.html (10,655 bytes)

16. Re: Introduction and request for equipment advice (score: 10)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:53:32 +1000
Peter, It may not be the finest, but it is fine. Try the Zoom H2 at $149 in your shirt pocket and a pair of $10 earphones for the best starter recording kit for getting solid ID recordings with no fu
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2011-06/msg00036.html (11,066 bytes)

17. Re: Introduction and request for equipment advice (score: 10)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:53:32 +1000
Thanks, I wouldn't expect anything in this pric range to be the finest, but= does "it is fine" mean the H4n is just ok, or that it's as good as an LS-1= 0 or 11? It seems really popular with musician
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2011-06/msg00037.html (12,888 bytes)

18. Odp: RE: [Nature Recordists] Introduction and request for equipment (score: 10)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:53:32 +1000
Hello Peter If You want to buy ME66 microphone, you have to choose which power module y= ou want to use with it. First, I found, that K6P module (needs external pha= ntom power only) is more expensiv
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2011-06/msg00038.html (14,994 bytes)

19. Re: Introduction and request for equipment advice (score: 10)
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:53:32 +1000
I found the Zoom H2 surprisingly good, for it's price. And, I'm sorry I sold it (wish I held on to it). Good luck, -Al -- In m("yahoogroups.com,","naturerecordists"); Bob & Sandi McLean < m("...","sn
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2011-06/msg00067.html (11,791 bytes)

20. Re: beginner Advice (score: 10)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:37:08 +1000
Yes. It's much more important to learn mic and field technique than to have the ultimate transparent transfer technique. The older Sharps are preferable to the older Sonys because the Sonys defaulted
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2006-08/msg00360.html (8,452 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu