Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Google

Results:

References: [ quality: 4821 ] [ inexpensive: 756 ] [ mic (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ low: 6167 ] [ noise: 9358 ]

Total 90 documents matching your query.

1. Fostex FR-2LE: best inexpensive recorder with phantom power (score: 209)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:35:38 +1000
Recently, several people have asked about recorders that can power pro mics in the field. Here's my choice, with comments about other recorder options. When you need a recorder with sturdy XLR inputs
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2010-03/msg00066.html (11,221 bytes)

2. Re: An inexpensive sound recorder for birders (score: 203)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:31 +1000
Thanks for the great review Robin! bu So its hard to monitor the recording with the headphones in the field at level 80-100,..? Some headphones are more efficient. What phones are you trying? e a . K
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2007-11/msg00038.html (9,355 bytes)

3. Sony HI-MD with an inexpensive spit chorded stereo mic.(think it came fr= (score: 203)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:35:36 +1000
Here are my needs: Long session outdoor environmental/wildlife recording(12 hour range at mini= mum) at whatever the highest level of quality I can achieve in a low noise = setting. Recordings must b
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2010-04/msg00246.html (8,310 bytes)

4. Re: An inexpensive sound recorder for birders (score: 202)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:31 +1000
I have not had any trouble with my H2 remembering settings. When I was in the field yesterday I turned the recorder on and off several times. I did notice, however, that the settings reset to the def
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2007-11/msg00037.html (10,713 bytes)

5. Re: Quality sound from digital video cameras (score: 153)
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:15:29 -0500
Rob Four channel, 32 bit recording has been available for some time on some professional DV gear, notable Sony DVCam studio recording decks. Not so bad actually, when handled with care it is equivale
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2006-03/msg00021.html (19,158 bytes)

6. Quality sound from digital video cameras (score: 151)
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 09:01:44 -0600
Hi Marc-- Greg provides a very interesting assessment of the Sony camcorder pre weakness. Also encouraging to learn the BBC is behind the mod! http://www.gregjwinter.com/modification2.htm. A 13dB les
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2006-03/msg00018.html (12,951 bytes)

7. Re: Quality sound from digital video cameras (score: 144)
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 19:14:18 -0500
Hi Rob When the Sony DV camcorders were evaluated by the BBC some years ago, the picture was deemed OK for broadcast but the audio was not. They made a modification which then require an outboard pre
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2006-03/msg00011.html (16,878 bytes)

8. Re: Quality sound from digital video cameras (score: 144)
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 08:44:05 -0600
<snip> Hi Marc-- I've also been surprised by the poor noise performance of some of the Sony camcorder mic pres-- especially with the older, VX-2000 model. Yet, the engineers at Sony built high qualit
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2006-03/msg00006.html (10,787 bytes)

9. Re: Newbie Question (score: 142)
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:26:55 -0800
Best suggestion is to stay with them, John, at all hours. Sometimes the shrimp let up a little and the propeller cavitation noise from boaters quits long enough for one to capture the sounds of the m
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2006-01/msg00238.html (129,051 bytes)

10. Newbie Question (score: 140)
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 12:26:12 -0500
Hello all I have been lurking and reading for quite some time and am VERY new at this= and have a VERY limited budget. I am forced to use free or inexpensive edi= ting and analytical software program
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2006-01/msg00235.html (115,794 bytes)

11. Re: Low budget Insect recording (score: 138)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:35:49 +1000
Al-- As was also stated by several people on the mic builders list, the mics you are experimenting with all have high self-noise when used in applications that require high record gain. Gerald White
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2009-08/msg00154.html (11,216 bytes)

12. 2. Re: Looking for a sound recorder on a tight budget (score: 133)
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:53:22 +1000
Sadly, in my experience, the H2's external mic input is considerably noisier than the internal mics are. For quiet subjects, I can recommend the H2 only for use with its internal mics. Zoom is about
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2010-07/msg00020.html (39,814 bytes)

13. 2. Re: Looking for a sound recorder on a tight budget (score: 130)
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:53:22 +1000
Quite a few pocket recorders, the H2 being one, are best-suited for recording robust sounds like music, close mic'd voice. loud settings and loud effects. Yes, when one increases the gain, the self-n
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2010-07/msg00007.html (35,857 bytes)

14. Re: Low budget Insect recording (score: 122)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:35:49 +1000
--Thank you, great info. I've actually been listening to that great compar= ison for a while now. The Telinga EMKS-23's sound amazing, but I am on a ve= ry low budget. Which is why I am focusing on
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2009-08/msg00155.html (9,163 bytes)

15. Re: Digest Number 1637 (score: 116)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 22:12:19 +0100
gain. http://www.birds.cornell.edu/MacaulayLibrary/contribute/equipmentOverview.ht stopped at minidisk or noise. not settings. ________________________________________________________________________
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2005-02/msg00153.html (63,178 bytes)

16. Re: a preamp survey (score: 109)
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:52:14 -0600
P1 At what record level? "10" no pad? One of the factors that makes the DA-P1 harder to compare is its gain structure is possibly very different: http://www.xs4all.nl/~fjkraan/digaud/dap1/MicrophoneC
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2004-02/msg00174.html (18,382 bytes)

17. Re: Preamp noise calculations (score: 91)
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 21:25:05 -0500
I believe he's charting the available numbers to make them more interpretable. I notice that Raimund's comment," It is sufficient that the preamplifier noise level is just a few dB's below that of th
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2006-04/msg00093.html (10,874 bytes)

18. Re: a preamp survey (score: 79)
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 23:49:09 +0100
Thanks Rob, obviously you have thought a lot about this. But still: I have recordings of atmos only, distant birds and perhaps a woodpecker coming in nearby every 45 sec or so. The mic is a Telinga M
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2004-02/msg00165.html (15,572 bytes)

19. new recorder - mic pre factors (score: 75)
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:21:35 -0500
Thanks for the clarifcation Klas. There is myth-busting to do. Last night I came across, http://www.digitraxx.com/ma_dmp3.html Any professional recording engineer will tell you that quality microphon
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2005-07/msg00401.html (22,165 bytes)

20. Re: PB224->Art PhanII->HiMD Test (score: 71)
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 16:03:34 -0500
I received an Art Phantom II unit and added it to the test. Looks as though there are two inexpensive portable phantom power supplies ($45 and $70) that work (at least) with NT1-A's to achieve extrem
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2005-07/msg00328.html (24,100 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu