Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Google

Results:

References: [ R09: 85 ] [ R09HR: 53 ] [ Edirol: 1053 ]

Total 126 documents matching your query.

1. Edirol R09 (score: 322)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:36:34 +1000
And then there is the Edirol R09 for $399 so it's going to be a tough call. Edirol or Zoom.
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2007-09/msg00021.html (6,840 bytes)

2. Re: digital input on Edirol R09? (score: 312)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:37:02 +1000
Was "Digital input on M-Audio MicroTrack 2496" but thought I'd ask about the Edirol R-09. Does it resample on record from external source? DaleH m,
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2006-11/msg00019.html (8,013 bytes)

3. Re: digital input on Edirol R09? (score: 312)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:37:02 +1000
The R-09 has no capability for digital input. --oryoki
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2006-11/msg00020.html (7,173 bytes)

4. 8. Re: SP-TFB-2 with Edirol R-09HR or Olympus LS-10? (score: 306)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:35:51 +1000
The chamber I'll test with the Fostex and NT1A's to get a better idea of its isolation - this test was more related to the battery box combinatio= n when used with the Fostex, e.g did it work, is it
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2009-07/msg00048.html (21,773 bytes)

5. 4. Re: SP-TFB-2 with Edirol R-09HR or Olympus LS-10? (score: 289)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:35:51 +1000
Hi Mike-- I got it. Looking forward to listening to your new "chamber." Are these your test objectives? (A) Battery box vs PIP? Not sure what an EM158N is,.."N?" (B) 3/4 vs Full Gain (with mics with
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2009-07/msg00044.html (19,473 bytes)

6. 2. Re: SP-TFB-2 with Edirol R-09HR or Olympus LS-10? (score: 279)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:35:51 +1000
I agree that the LS-10 input amp doesn't seem to be the most silent. But: Having used handheld recorders that switches them self off or, on occasions, don't work at all for no understandable reason..
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2009-07/msg00042.html (19,187 bytes)

7. 3. Re: SP-TFB-2 with Edirol R-09HR or Olympus LS-10? (score: 279)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:35:51 +1000
Even as a staunch 722-er, I'm with you, Klas. It's a lovely device...particularly when one achieves a certain age. Bernie www.pterodaktyl.co.uk/ Wild Sanctuary POB 536 Glen Ellen, CA 95442 707-996-66
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2009-07/msg00043.html (21,498 bytes)

8. 5. Re: SP-TFB-2 with Edirol R-09HR or Olympus LS-10? (score: 279)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:35:51 +1000
Hi Bernie & KlasNo contest on the quest for convenience and reliability. I'm running trials and thinking about taking an MP2->H2 combo on a once in a lifetime jaunt with a bunch of 8GB cards. I would
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2009-07/msg00045.html (24,976 bytes)

9. 6. Re: SP-TFB-2 with Edirol R-09HR or Olympus LS-10? (score: 279)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:35:51 +1000
Yes... priorities change a bit, don't they. Anyway, I feel a bit younger now, you know what I mean, I hope you do too. Klas. Telinga Microphones, Botarbo, S-748 96 Tobo, Sweden. Phone & fax int + 295
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2009-07/msg00046.html (23,772 bytes)

10. 7. Re: SP-TFB-2 with Edirol R-09HR or Olympus LS-10? (score: 279)
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:35:51 +1000
While Martyn, Kevin, and I were leading a soundscape workshop in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, last week, we had a moment to record a dramatic series of thunderstorms that swept through the valley. Basicall
/archives/html/naturerecordists/2009-07/msg00047.html (28,316 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
This search system is powered by Namazu