Here's one starting place: http://www.acousticecology.org/ocean.html check "ocean noise reports" -jeremiah _ _ _ _ x _ _ _ _ _ _ high inga oved to d" y I ain. ng a or one hear mp. it. 't ct h ut y. s
I don't know if this is the correct method of sending my question but here = goes I am interested in getting information regarding the effects of man-made no= ise on fish. I have developed a list of
Klas-- Thanks much for taking time to spell out your priorities and specific testing methods. I toally agree that the CAD 179 is not on par with the Sennheiser mics even though CAD claims comparable
!/ That is a relevant question - you have to identify the noise by it's character. When working with a mic in the lab for several days, you learn to hear what the noise sounds like, just like you lea
Assuming a NH-900 HiMD mic pre reference, I'm pretty sure the answer is "no." I believe the noise component from an ME-62 is above the noise floor this pre, assuming the noise/output performance on b
In addition to being able to compare high gain performance of some of the popular PIP compatible mics, my other hope was getting at a ballpark "effective" self noise figure for the consumer PIP mic p
Richard, your comments are very useful together with Graham's Low Sens observation. By chance in helping student record a lute tonight with Panasonic WM61A's, I found that the Low Sensitivity setting
It may not be the HiMD mic pre clipping. Something that is pretty sick about my HiMD NH700 is the gutless plug-in-power capability. The PIP measures an acceptable 2.3V open circuit, but when I plug
Klas How are you Mic picking noise from pre-amp noise? o k src=3Dbc o n c -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.8 - Release
Thanks Rob, yes, I would like to swing a barrel of malt with you even though I have not downloaded your files. I don't have quick time, for examp= le. I'll be back here tomorrow or Monday. I will pre