..and a surprise quite a few recordists have capitalized on. Some might recall that it was Eric Benjamin who suggested and later bench tested the AT-3032's after discussion on this list about the nee
Ah,.. The nose-dive in frequency response your sample shows starting at 4KHz (see green line on the right most chart) https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/type/public/media/RichAT3202_PaulAT3202.jpg suggests
Hi PhilSorry. I think I may have confused your application with the 3032's and the Mix Pre and Paul's. Phantom powering could be a factor, but Paul seems to be connecting his mics directly to the HDP
Hi Rob and Phil, The recording was made in a rural setting, but there was significant breeze in the tree canopy, so that will clearly have some effect. But that does not explain what sounds like a LF
Nice addition. 4 oz. and 5.5" long. Thanks! Rob D. =3D =3D =3D -- Rob Danielson Film Department University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee _____________________________________________________________________
Rob, I have another addition: Audio Technica AT3032 16 dBA 19.9 mV/Pa It's notable in being lower noise than any of the other low-cost microphones (excepting the large-diaphragm types), and is availa
Hi Paul-- Hi Paul-- Eric's self noise (and other) measurements have been pretty reliable thus far: http://bioacoustics.cse.unsw.edu.au/archives/html/naturerecordists/2005-11/msg00190.html By chance,
Hi Paul-- Perhaps, after they are tested, they a grouped into different lots. If we can prove that the performance of your units is substantially poorer than other 3032's, AT should be happy to repla
Hi Rob, Perhaps I'm just extremely unlucky - as you observed recently I have the noisiest AT3032 you have ever heard, and the mic I'm using in my dish is noisier again. cheers Paul "While a picture i